• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗伯特·维特的移植伦理学:从已故者获取和分配器官。

Robert Veatch's transplantation ethics: obtaining and allocating organs from deceased persons.

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09574-3. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11017-022-09574-3
PMID:35680730
Abstract

This essay appreciatively and critically engages the late Robert Veatch's extensive and important contributions to transplantation ethics, in the context of his overall ethical theory and his methods for resolving conflicts among ethical principles. It focuses mainly on ways to obtain and allocate organs from deceased persons, with particular attention to express donation, mandated choice, and presumed consent/routine salvaging in organ procurement and to conflicts between medical utility and egalitarian justice in organ allocation. It concludes by examining the unclear relations between Veatch's ideal moral theory and his nonideal moral theory, especially in organ allocation.

摘要

本文赞赏并批判性地探讨了已故罗伯特·维特(Robert Veatch)在移植伦理学方面的广泛而重要的贡献,探讨范围涵盖他的整体伦理理论以及他解决伦理原则冲突的方法。本文主要关注从已故者获取和分配器官的方式,特别关注表达性捐赠、强制性选择以及在器官获取中假定同意/常规抢救,以及在器官分配中医疗效用和平均主义正义之间的冲突。本文最后还探讨了维特的理想道德理论与非理想道德理论之间的关系不明确的问题,尤其是在器官分配方面。

相似文献

1
Robert Veatch's transplantation ethics: obtaining and allocating organs from deceased persons.罗伯特·维特的移植伦理学:从已故者获取和分配器官。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09574-3. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
2
Does medical ethics have its own theory?医学伦理学有其自身的理论吗?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Aug;12(4):38-9.
3
The survival lottery.生存彩票
Philosophy. 1975 Jan;50(191):81-7. doi: 10.1017/s0031819100059118.
4
Veatch's new foundation for medical ethics.维奇的医学伦理学新基础。
J Med Philos. 1985 Nov;10(4):369-86. doi: 10.1093/jmp/10.4.369.
5
Applying utilitarianism to the presumed consent system for organ donation to consider the moral pros and cons.将功利主义应用于假定同意器官捐献制度,以考虑道德上的利弊。
Br J Nurs. 2021 Oct 28;30(19):1127-1131. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.19.1127.
6
Moral distance and distributive justice: how the increase in organ donation is helping us make better ethical decisions.道德距离与分配正义:器官捐献的增加如何帮助我们做出更好的伦理决策。
Anaesthesia. 2015 Jan;70(1):10-3. doi: 10.1111/anae.12931. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
7
On the possibility of "progress" in managing biomedical technologies: markets, lotteries, and rational moral standards in organ transplantation.论生物医学技术管理中“进步”的可能性:器官移植中的市场、抽签与合理道德标准
Cap Univ Law Rev. 2003;31(1):13-69.
8
The ethics of organ donation.器官捐赠的伦理问题。
Todays OR Nurse. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):8-12.
9
General principles for allocating human organs and tissues.人体器官和组织分配的一般原则。
Transplant Proc. 1992 Oct;24(5):2227-35.
10
Egalitarian and maximin theories of justice: directed donation of organs for transplant.平等主义与正义的最大最小值理论:器官移植的定向捐赠
J Med Philos. 1998 Aug;23(5):456-76. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.5.456.2570.

引用本文的文献

1
The philosopher as partner: an introduction to the scholarship of Robert M. Veatch.哲学家的伙伴:罗伯特·M·维特学术简介。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Aug;43(4):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09572-5. Epub 2022 Jul 13.