Bergh Anna, Asplund Kjell, Lund Iréne, Boström Anna, Hyytiäinen Heli
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, SE 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 2;12(11):1440. doi: 10.3390/ani12111440.
Soft tissue mobilization is frequently used in the treatment of sport and companion animals. There is, however, uncertainty regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of these methods. Therefore, the aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the evidence for clinical effects of massage and stretching in cats, dogs, and horses. A bibliographic search, restricted to studies in cats, dogs, and horses, was performed on Web of Science Core Collection, CABI, and PubMed. Relevant articles were assessed for scientific quality, and information was extracted on study characteristics, species, type of treatment, indication, and treatment effects. Of 1189 unique publications screened, 11 were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed as high in eight of the studies and moderate in three of the studies, two of the latter indicating a decreased heart rate after massage. There was considerable heterogeneity in reported treatment effects. Therefore, the scientific evidence is not strong enough to define the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of massage and stretching in sport and companion animals.
软组织松动术常用于运动动物和伴侣动物的治疗。然而,这些方法的疗效和有效性尚不确定。因此,本系统文献综述的目的是评估按摩和拉伸对猫、狗和马的临床效果的证据。在科学网核心合集、CABI和PubMed上进行了文献检索,检索范围限于猫、狗和马的研究。对相关文章的科学质量进行了评估,并提取了有关研究特征、物种、治疗类型、适应症和治疗效果的信息。在筛选的1189篇独特出版物中,有11篇符合纳入标准。八项研究的偏倚风险被评估为高,三项研究的偏倚风险为中等,后三项研究中的两项表明按摩后心率下降。报告的治疗效果存在相当大的异质性。因此,科学证据不足以确定按摩和拉伸对运动动物和伴侣动物的临床疗效和有效性。