Wilson Janine M, McKenzie Erica, Duesterdieck-Zellmer Katja
Oregon Equine, Damascus, OR, United States.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 11;5:120. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00120. eCollection 2018.
To define which biologic, electrophysical and other modalities are used in horses for injury or performance issues, a questionnaire regarding 38 modalities was distributed to eight veterinary groups. A total of 305 complete or partial responses were obtained from over 10 geographic regions; 75.4% from private equine practice or regional private equine referral hospitals, 14.1% from university teaching hospitals or satellite clinics, 8.2% from private mixed animal practice, and 2.3% from veterinary rehabilitation centers. The majority of respondents were located in the USA (60%), Europe (25.6%), and Canada (5.6%). Respondents reported working with athletic horses primarily in the disciplines of hunter-jumper (26.9%), dressage (16.0%), and pleasure riding (14.7%), followed by Western riding, track racing, and eventing. Warmbloods (39.7%) were the predominant breed presenting to respondents, followed by Thoroughbreds (20.3%) and Quarter Horses (17.3%) ahead of other breeds. All 38 modalities were used by respondents. The 10 most prominently utilized were controlled hand walking (97.3%), therapeutic shoeing (96.1%), ice (95.2%), compression bandaging (89.5%), platelet rich plasma (PRP; 86.5%), therapeutic exercises (84.3%), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein therapy (IRAP; 81.4%), stretching (83.3%), and cold water hydrotherapy (82.9%). Heat (77.6%), massage (69.0%), and acupuncture (68.3%) were also commonly utilized. The least prominently used modalities were hyperbaric oxygen therapy (9.4%), cytowave (8.3%), and radiofrequency (6.4%). Injectable modalities (IRAP, PRP, mesotherapy, stem cells) were almost solely administered by veterinarians; other modalities were variably applied by veterinarians, technicians, veterinary assistants, farriers, physical therapists, trainers, and other entities. A total of 33% of respondents reported working collaboratively with physical therapists on equine patients. Findings indicate that a broad range of invasive and non-invasive modalities are used in equine patients to address a variety of rehabilitation and performance needs, and that personnel with varying levels of expertise are involved in their administration. This suggests that further investigation to better define the delivery, efficacy and any negative effects of many of these modalities is important.
为确定在马匹中针对损伤或性能问题使用了哪些生物、电生理及其他治疗方式,一份关于38种治疗方式的调查问卷被分发给了八个兽医团体。从超过10个地理区域共获得了305份完整或部分回复;75.4%来自私人马匹诊所或地区性私人马匹转诊医院,14.1%来自大学教学医院或卫星诊所,8.2%来自私人混合动物诊所,2.3%来自兽医康复中心。大多数受访者位于美国(60%)、欧洲(25.6%)和加拿大(5.6%)。受访者报告主要与从事狩猎障碍赛(26.9%)、盛装舞步(16.0%)和休闲骑乘(14.7%)项目的运动马匹打交道,其次是西部骑乘、赛马和三日赛。温血马(39.7%)是向受访者就诊的主要品种,其次是纯种马(20.3%)和夸特马(17.3%),领先于其他品种。所有38种治疗方式受访者均有使用。使用最频繁的10种是控制性牵遛(97.3%)、治疗性蹄铁护理(96.1%)、冰敷(95.2%)、加压包扎(89.5%)、富血小板血浆(PRP;86.5%)、治疗性运动(84.3%)、白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂蛋白疗法(IRAP;81.4%)、拉伸(83.3%)和冷水水疗法(82.9%)。热敷(77.6%)、按摩(69.0%)和针灸(68.3%)也经常被使用。使用最少的治疗方式是高压氧疗法(9.4%)、细胞波疗法(8.3%)和射频疗法(6.4%)。注射类治疗方式(IRAP、PRP、中医疗法、干细胞)几乎完全由兽医施用;其他治疗方式则由兽医、技术人员、兽医助理、蹄铁匠、物理治疗师、训练师及其他机构人员以不同方式施用。共有33%的受访者报告在马匹患者治疗中与物理治疗师合作。研究结果表明,在马匹患者中使用了广泛的侵入性和非侵入性治疗方式以满足各种康复和性能需求,且不同专业水平的人员参与了这些治疗方式的施用。这表明进一步调查以更好地界定许多这些治疗方式的施用方式、疗效及任何负面影响很重要。