Suppr超能文献

冠心病患者的非持续性室性心动过速:电生理研究的作用

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: role of electrophysiologic study.

作者信息

Buxton A E, Marchlinski F E, Flores B T, Miller J M, Doherty J U, Josephson M E

出版信息

Circulation. 1987 Jun;75(6):1178-85. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.75.6.1178.

Abstract

Sixty-two consecutive patients with chronic coronary artery disease referred for evaluation of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent electrophysiologic studies. Sustained VT was induced by one to three ventricular extrastimuli in 28 patients (45%). Therapy was guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing in 44 patients: 19 patients without inducible sustained VT received no antiarrhythmic therapy, and 25 patients with inducible sustained or symptomatic nonsustained VT received therapy guided by the results of electrophysiologic studies. The results of electrophysiologic studies were ignored by physicians for a second group of 18 patients: four had inducible sustained VT but received no antiarrhythmic therapy, and 14 had inducible sustained or nonsustained VT and received antiarrhythmic therapy not guided by results of electrophysiologic testing. After a mean follow-up period of 28 months, 11 patients had died suddenly. Seven of the 11 patients who died suddenly had inducible sustained VT. Three of 44 patients in the group receiving therapy guided by electrophysiologic studies died suddenly versus eight of 18 in the group receiving therapy not guided by electrophysiologic studies (p = .001). Only one of 19 patients without inducible sustained VT who were not treated experienced sudden death. Two of four patients with inducible sustained VT who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy died suddenly. Multivariate analysis of the relationship of induced arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction, site of myocardial infarction, history of syncope, or type of antiarrhythmic therapy to outcome revealed a greater than twofold increased risk for sudden cardiac death in patients whose therapy was not guided by results of electrophysiologic study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

62例因非持续性室性心动过速(VT)接受评估的慢性冠状动脉疾病患者连续接受了电生理研究。28例患者(45%)通过1至3次心室期外刺激诱发出持续性VT。44例患者的治疗以电生理测试结果为指导:19例未诱发出持续性VT的患者未接受抗心律失常治疗,25例诱发出持续性或症状性非持续性VT的患者接受了以电生理研究结果为指导的治疗。医生忽略了另一组18例患者的电生理研究结果:4例诱发出持续性VT但未接受抗心律失常治疗,14例诱发出持续性或非持续性VT且接受了非电生理测试结果指导的抗心律失常治疗。平均随访28个月后,11例患者猝死。11例猝死患者中有7例诱发出持续性VT。在接受电生理研究指导治疗的组中,44例患者中有3例猝死,而在未接受电生理研究指导治疗的组中,18例患者中有8例猝死(p = .001)。19例未诱发出持续性VT且未接受治疗的患者中只有1例发生猝死。4例诱发出持续性VT但未接受抗心律失常治疗的患者中有2例猝死。对诱发性心律失常、左心室射血分数、心肌梗死部位、晕厥史或抗心律失常治疗类型与预后关系的多因素分析显示,治疗未以电生理研究结果为指导的患者心脏性猝死风险增加两倍以上。(摘要截短于250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验