Suppr超能文献

复苏期间家属撤离与激动对团队工作量的影响:一项基于单中心随机模拟的研究

The Impact of Withdrawn vs. Agitated Relatives during Resuscitation on Team Workload: A Single-Center Randomised Simulation-Based Study.

作者信息

Sellmann Timur, Oendorf Andrea, Wetzchewald Dietmar, Schwager Heidrun, Thal Serge Christian, Marsch Stephan

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Bethesda Hospital, 47053 Duisburg, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology 1, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 2;11(11):3163. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113163.

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend that relatives be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This randomised trial investigated the effects of two different behaviour patterns of relatives on rescuers’ perceived stress and quality of CPR. Material and methods: Teams of three to four physicians were randomised to perform CPR in the presence of no relatives (control group), a withdrawn relative, or an agitated relative, played by actors according to a scripted role, and to three different models of leadership (randomly determined by the team or tutor or left open). The scenarios were video-recorded. Hands-on time was primary, and the secondary outcomes comprised compliance to CPR algorithms, perceived workload, and the influence of leadership. Results: 1229 physicians randomised to 366 teams took part. The presence of a relative did not affect hands-on time (91% [87−93] vs. 92% [88−94] for “withdrawn” and 92 [88−93] for “agitated” relatives; p = 0.15). The teams interacted significantly less with a “withdrawn” than with an “agitated” relative (11 [7−16]% vs. 23 [15−30]% of the time spent for resuscitation, p < 0.01). The teams confronted with an “agitated” relative showed more unsafe defibrillations, higher ventilation rates, and a delay in starting CPR (all p < 0.05 vs. control). The presence of a relative increased frustration, effort, and perceived temporal demands (all <0.05 compared to control); in addition, an “agitated” relative increased mental demands and total task load (both p < 0.05 compared to “withdrawn” and control group). The type of leadership condition did not show any effects. Conclusions: Interaction with a relative accounted for up to 25% of resuscitation time. Whereas the presence of a relative per se increased the task load in different domains, only the presence of an “agitated” relative had a marginal detrimental effect on CPR quality (GERMAN study registers number DRKS00024761).

摘要

背景

指南建议在心肺复苏(CPR)期间亲属应在场。这项随机试验研究了亲属的两种不同行为模式对施救者感知压力和心肺复苏质量的影响。

材料与方法

由三到四名医生组成的团队被随机分配,分别在没有亲属在场(对照组)、有一名表现冷漠的亲属或一名表现激动的亲属(由演员按照设定角色扮演)的情况下进行心肺复苏,并采用三种不同的领导模式(由团队或导师随机确定或不做设定)。这些场景被录像。实际操作时间是主要观察指标,次要观察指标包括对心肺复苏算法的依从性、感知工作量以及领导模式的影响。

结果

1229名被随机分配到366个团队的医生参与了研究。亲属在场并未影响实际操作时间(“冷漠”亲属组为91%[87 - 93],“激动”亲属组为92%[88 - 94],对照组为92%[88 - 93];p = 0.15)。与“激动”亲属相比,团队与“冷漠”亲属的互动显著减少(分别占复苏时间的11%[7 - 16]%和23%[15 - 30]%,p < 0.01)。面对“激动”亲属的团队出现更多不安全的除颤、更高的通气率以及心肺复苏启动延迟(与对照组相比,均p < 0.05)。亲属在场增加了挫败感、努力程度和感知到的时间需求(与对照组相比,均p < 0.05);此外,“激动”亲属增加了心理需求和总任务负荷(与“冷漠”亲属组和对照组相比,均p < 0.05)。领导模式类型未显示出任何影响。

结论

与亲属的互动占复苏时间的比例高达25%。虽然亲属在场本身会增加不同方面的任务负荷,但只有“激动”亲属在场对心肺复苏质量有轻微的不利影响(德国研究注册号DRKS00024761)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f186/9180995/5a0c8c207e4a/jcm-11-03163-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验