Suppr超能文献

使用光学相干断层扫描正面图像自动确定黄斑裂孔中心

Automatic Determination of the Center of Macular Hole Using Optical Coherence Tomography En Face Images.

作者信息

Sasaki Takanori, Shoji Takuhei, Kanno Junji, Ishii Hirokazu, Yoshikawa Yuji, Ibuki Hisashi, Shinoda Kei

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 2;11(11):3167. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113167.

Abstract

To evaluate the automated determination of the center of an idiopathic macular hole (MH) by using swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) images with new macro-based algorithms in ImageJ and to compare the difference between the MH center measurements obtained automatically and manually. This cross-sectional study included 39 eyes of 39 elderly individuals (22 women, 17 men) with stage 3 and 4 MH. The MH center was automatically determined using the ImageJ macro. The foveal center was also manually identified by two masked examiners using horizontal and vertical serial B-scan OCT angiography images. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.3 years. After adjusting for the effect of magnification, the mean distance between the MH center determined manually by Examiner 1 and that determined automatically was 15.5 ± 9.9 µm. The mean distance between the two manually determined measurements of the MH center was 20.3 ± 19.7 µm. These two mean distance values did not differ significantly (Welch t-test, p = 0.27) and was non-inferior (p < 0.0001). The automated ImageJ-based method for determining the MH center was comparable to manual methods. This study showed that automated measurements were non-inferior to manual measurements, and demonstrated a substitutable usefulness, at least for use in clinical practice.

摘要

利用ImageJ中基于新宏的算法,通过扫频光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像评估特发性黄斑裂孔(MH)中心的自动测定,并比较自动测量和手动测量获得的MH中心测量值之间的差异。这项横断面研究纳入了39名患有3期和4期MH的老年人(22名女性,17名男性)的39只眼睛。使用ImageJ宏自动测定MH中心。两名盲法检查者还使用水平和垂直系列B扫描OCT血管造影图像手动识别黄斑中心。平均年龄为68.8±8.3岁。在调整放大倍数的影响后,检查者1手动测定的MH中心与自动测定的MH中心之间的平均距离为15.5±9.9µm。两次手动测定的MH中心测量值之间的平均距离为20.3±19.7µm。这两个平均距离值无显著差异(韦尔奇t检验,p = 0.27)且非劣效(p < 0.0001)。基于ImageJ的自动测定MH中心的方法与手动方法相当。本研究表明,自动测量不劣于手动测量,并显示出可替代的实用性,至少在临床实践中是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ec/9181087/6582abec62ff/jcm-11-03167-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验