Maheshwer Bhargavi, Parvaresh Kevin C, Williams Brady T, Polce Evan M, Schloss Daniel, Chahla Jorge
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Orthopaedic Specialty Institute, Orange, California.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Jan 7;12(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00047. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
Anatomic posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction is utilized for ligamentous knee instability associated with PLC injury in patients who desire a return to active lifestyles. The fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and popliteal tendon (PLT) are reconstructed in anatomic fashion according to techniques described by LaPrade et al..
Various PLC reconstruction techniques have been described; however, the preferred reconstruction technique of the senior author is the method developed by LaPrade et al. that restores the anatomy of the 3 primary stabilizers of the PLC, including the FCL, PLT, and popliteofibular ligament.
Alternative nonoperative treatments include knee immobilization for 4 weeks and physical therapy. Surgical alternatives include PLC repair, which involves repair of the lateral collateral ligament, PLT, and/or popliteofibular ligament if structures can be anatomically reduced to their attachment site. However, repair of acute grade-III PLC injuries with staged treatment of concurrent cruciate injuries is associated with a substantially higher postoperative PLC failure rate.
Clinical outcomes have demonstrated that primary repairs have significantly higher rates of reoperation compared with reconstruction; therefore, reconstruction is recommended. Treatment of grade-III PLC injuries with reconstruction of midsubstance tears and any associated cruciate ligament tears results in significantly improved objective stability. In addition, anatomic PLC reconstruction has demonstrated improved subjective and objective patient outcomes compared with nonsurgical treatment or repair.
Reconstruction of the PLC offers excellent outcomes after surgery. Studies have shown that the fibular-based technique for treatment of a chronic isolated PLC injury showed good results in terms of clinical outcome, restoring knee varus and rotational stability.
Patients with associated proximal tibiofibular joint instability will benefit from this reconstruction because this technique will add stability to the joint.This surgical approach is technically demanding, requiring proficiency with surgical dissection.Damage to the common peroneal nerve can potentially occur. Careful dissection and placement of retractors should be observed.Risks include surgical failure due to unrecognized malalignment; especially in chronic cases, the patient should have a complete evaluation of the standing alignment and tibial slope.
FCL = fibular collateral ligamentPFL = popliteofibular ligamentPLC = posterolateral cornerIT = iliotibialIKDC = International Knee Documentation CommitteeACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentPEEK = polyetheretherketonePROM = passive range of motion.
解剖学后外侧角(PLC)重建用于那些希望恢复积极生活方式、与PLC损伤相关的膝关节韧带不稳定患者。根据LaPrade等人描述的技术,以解剖学方式重建腓侧副韧带(FCL)和腘肌腱(PLT)。
已经描述了多种PLC重建技术;然而,资深作者首选的重建技术是LaPrade等人开发的方法,该方法可恢复PLC的3个主要稳定器的解剖结构,包括FCL、PLT和腘腓韧带。
替代的非手术治疗包括膝关节固定4周和物理治疗。手术替代方案包括PLC修复,如果结构能够在解剖学上复位到其附着部位,则涉及外侧副韧带、PLT和/或腘腓韧带的修复。然而,对急性III级PLC损伤进行修复并分期治疗并发的十字韧带损伤,术后PLC失败率会显著更高。
临床结果表明,与重建相比,初次修复的再次手术率显著更高;因此,建议进行重建。用重建治疗III级PLC损伤的中间部分撕裂和任何相关的十字韧带撕裂,可显著改善客观稳定性。此外,与非手术治疗或修复相比,解剖学PLC重建已显示出患者主观和客观结果的改善。
PLC重建术后效果良好。研究表明,基于腓骨的技术治疗慢性孤立性PLC损伤在临床结果方面显示出良好效果,恢复了膝关节内翻和旋转稳定性。
伴有近端胫腓关节不稳定的患者将从这种重建中受益,因为该技术将增加关节的稳定性。这种手术方法技术要求高,需要熟练的手术解剖技能。可能会发生腓总神经损伤。应注意仔细解剖和放置牵开器。风险包括因未识别的排列不齐导致手术失败;特别是在慢性病例中,患者应进行站立位排列和胫骨坡度的全面评估。
FCL = 腓侧副韧带;PFL = 腘腓韧带;PLC = 后外侧角;IT = 髂胫束;IKDC = 国际膝关节文献委员会;ACL = 前交叉韧带;PCL = 后交叉韧带;PEEK = 聚醚醚酮;PROM = 被动活动范围