• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

携带纳洛酮的动机:急诊科患者的定性分析。

Motivation to Carry Naloxone: A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Department Patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, 21798Perelman School of Medicine and the Center for Public Health Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, 43358Perelman School of Medicine the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2023 Feb;37(2):200-209. doi: 10.1177/08901171221107908. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1177/08901171221107908
PMID:35686433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9949384/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our aim was to explore perspectives of patients who received naloxone in the emergency department (ED) about (1) naloxone carrying and use following an ED visit and (2) motivation for performing these behaviors.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews of patients prescribed naloxone at ED discharge.

SETTINGS

Three urban academic EDs in Philadelphia, PA.

PARTICIPANTS

25 participants completed the in-depth, semi-structured interviews and demographic surveys. Participants were majority male, African American, and had previously witnessed or experienced an overdose.

METHODS

Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. We used a hybrid inductive-deductive approach that included prespecified and emergent themes.

RESULTS

We found that naloxone carrying behavior was variable and influenced by four main motivators: (1) naloxone access; (2) personal experience and salience of naloxone, (3) comfort with naloxone administration, and (4) societal influences on naloxone carrying. In particular, those with personal history of overdose or close friends or family at risk were motivated to carry naloxone.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study reported several important motivators for naloxone carrying after an ED visit, including ease of naloxone access and comfort, perceived risk of experiencing or encountering an overdose, and social influences on naloxone carrying behaviors. EDs, health systems, and public health officials should consider these factors influencing motivation when designing future interventions to increase access, carrying, and use of naloxone.

摘要

目的

我们旨在探讨在急诊科(ED)接受纳洛酮的患者对以下方面的看法:(1)在 ED 就诊后携带和使用纳洛酮;(2)实施这些行为的动机。

设计

对 ED 出院时开具纳洛酮的患者进行半结构化访谈。

地点

宾夕法尼亚州费城的三家城市学术性急诊科。

参与者

25 名参与者完成了深入的半结构化访谈和人口统计调查。参与者主要为男性、非裔美国人,并且曾目睹或经历过过量用药。

方法

使用内容分析法对访谈进行记录、转录和分析。我们采用了一种混合的归纳演绎方法,包括预设和新兴主题。

结果

我们发现,携带纳洛酮的行为是多变的,受到四个主要动机的影响:(1)纳洛酮的可及性;(2)个人对纳洛酮的经历和显著性;(3)对纳洛酮给药的舒适度;(4)对携带纳洛酮的社会影响。特别是那些有过量用药史或有风险的亲密朋友或家人的人更有动机携带纳洛酮。

结论

本研究的参与者报告了 ED 就诊后携带纳洛酮的几个重要动机,包括纳洛酮获取的便利性和舒适度、对经历或遇到过量用药的感知风险,以及对携带纳洛酮行为的社会影响。ED、医疗系统和公共卫生官员在设计未来增加纳洛酮获取、携带和使用的干预措施时,应考虑这些影响动机的因素。

相似文献

1
Motivation to Carry Naloxone: A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Department Patients.携带纳洛酮的动机:急诊科患者的定性分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Feb;37(2):200-209. doi: 10.1177/08901171221107908. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
2
Patient perspectives on naloxone receipt in the emergency department: a qualitative exploration.患者对在急诊科获得纳洛酮的看法:一项定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00677-7.
3
Opioid education and nasal naloxone rescue kits in the emergency department.急诊科的阿片类药物教育及鼻腔纳洛酮急救包
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):381-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.2.24909. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
4
Assessment of Patient-Reported Naloxone Acquisition and Carrying With an Automated Text Messaging System After Emergency Department Discharge in Philadelphia.费城急诊出院后使用自动化短信系统评估患者报告的纳洛酮获取和携带情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223986. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3986.
5
Is a randomised controlled trial of take home naloxone distributed in emergency settings likely to be feasible and acceptable? Findings from a UK qualitative study exploring perspectives of people who use opioids and emergency services staff.在急诊环境中分发可携带纳洛酮的随机对照试验是否可行和可接受?一项英国定性研究探索了阿片类药物使用者和急诊服务人员的观点。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00987-y.
6
Emergency department physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on take-home naloxone.急诊科医生和药剂师对纳洛酮带回家的看法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Feb;38(2):169-176. doi: 10.1111/dar.12894. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Naloxone provision to emergency department patients recognized as high-risk for opioid use disorder.为被认为有阿片类药物使用障碍高风险的急诊科患者提供纳洛酮。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;40:173-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.061. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Beliefs Associated with Pharmacy-Based Naloxone: a Qualitative Study of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Purchasers and People at Risk for Opioid Overdose.与药店纳洛酮相关的信念:基于药店纳洛酮购买者和阿片类药物过量风险人群的定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2019 Jun;96(3):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00349-1.
9
Naloxone Use Among Emergency Department Patients with Opioid Overdose.急诊科阿片类药物过量患者中纳洛酮的使用情况。
J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.022.
10
"They're not doing enough.": women's experiences with opioids and naloxone in Toronto.“他们做得还不够。”:多伦多女性对阿片类药物和纳洛酮的体验。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Mar 20;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00360-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-review: Harm reduction strategies among people who intentionally use fentanyl.小型综述:故意使用芬太尼人群中的减少伤害策略
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 May 24;21:100615. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100615. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
"It's nothing personal": understanding barriers to relational harm reduction practices during inpatient hospitalization.“这并非针对个人”:理解住院期间减少关系伤害行为的障碍
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jun 11;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01240-w.
3
Organizational perspectives on the impacts of scaling up overdose education and naloxone distribution in Kentucky.关于在肯塔基州扩大过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发影响的组织观点。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 14;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00553-2.
4
Neighborhood and Individual Disparities in Community-Based Naloxone Access for Opioid Overdose Prevention.社区中纳洛酮获取途径的邻里和个体差异对阿片类药物过量预防的影响。
J Urban Health. 2024 Feb;101(1):64-74. doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00821-z. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Nonfatal Opioid Overdoses at an Urban Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic.城市急诊科在 COVID-19 大流行期间的非致命性阿片类药物过量。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1673-1674. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17477.
2
Overdose Awareness and Reversal Trainings at Philadelphia Public Libraries.费城公共图书馆的过量用药意识和逆转培训。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Feb;35(2):250-254. doi: 10.1177/0890117120937909. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
More than just availability: Who has access and who administers take-home naloxone in Baltimore, MD.不仅仅是可获得性:谁能获得并管理马里兰州巴尔的摩市的纳洛酮?
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224686. eCollection 2019.
4
Stigma Associated with Opioid Use Disorders in Adolescents Limits Naloxone Prescribing.青少年阿片类药物使用障碍相关污名将限制纳洛酮的处方。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Nov-Dec;49:92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
5
Beliefs Associated with Pharmacy-Based Naloxone: a Qualitative Study of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Purchasers and People at Risk for Opioid Overdose.与药店纳洛酮相关的信念:基于药店纳洛酮购买者和阿片类药物过量风险人群的定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2019 Jun;96(3):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00349-1.
6
The Emergency Department as an Opportunity for Naloxone Distribution.急诊科作为纳洛酮分发的机会。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):1036-1042. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38829. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
A Quality Framework for Emergency Department Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.阿质量框架为急诊部处理阿片类药物使用障碍。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;73(3):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.08.439. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Modeling Health Benefits and Harms of Public Policy Responses to the US Opioid Epidemic.模拟美国阿片类药物泛滥公共政策反应的健康效益和危害。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1394-1400. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304590. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
9
Awareness and access to naloxone necessary but not sufficient: Examining gaps in the naloxone cascade.纳洛酮的意识和获取是必要的,但还不够:检查纳洛酮级联中的差距。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:94-97. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?定性研究数据的主题分析:它有听起来那么简单吗?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.