Department of Pain, Yichun People's Hospital, Yichun, Jiangxi Province, PR China.
Department of Pain, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, PR China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 10;101(23):e29394. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029394.
To provide a basis for treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), we compared the efficacy of lidocaine and ropivacaine stellate ganglion block (SGB) in PHN treatment in the upper limbs.Data from 252 patients with upper-limb PHN were retrospectively analyzed. The lidocaine group (n = 118) was treated with oral pregabalin capsules 75 mg twice a day, tramadol hydrochloride sustained release tablets 100 mg twice a day, and amitriptyline 25 mg once at night combined with ultrasound-guided lidocaine SGB; the ropivacaine group (n = 134) was orally administered the same medicines combined with ultrasound-guided ropivacaine SGB. The visual analog scale (VAS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and adverse reactions were compared between the groups before treatment and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment.There were no significant differences between the lidocaine and ropivacaine groups in terms of sex, age, height, weight, and pain duration (P > .05). There was no significant difference between the groups in VAS and SAS scores before treatment (P > .05). At 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after ultrasound-guided SGB treatment, the VAS and SAS scores were significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the lidocaine group (P < .05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of adverse reactions (P > .05).For ultrasound-guided SGB treatment of upper limb PHN, ropivacaine is superior to lidocaine. Ultrasound-guided ropivacaine SGB is safe and effective for the treatment of upper limb PHN.
为了为治疗疱疹后神经痛(PHN)提供依据,我们比较了利多卡因和罗哌卡因星状神经节阻滞(SGB)治疗上肢 PHN 的疗效。
回顾性分析了 252 例上肢 PHN 患者的数据。利多卡因组(n=118)接受口服普瑞巴林胶囊 75mg,每日 2 次,盐酸曲马多缓释片 100mg,每日 2 次,阿米替林 25mg,每晚 1 次,联合超声引导下利多卡因 SGB;罗哌卡因组(n=134)接受相同药物口服,联合超声引导下罗哌卡因 SGB。比较两组治疗前及治疗后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和不良反应。
利多卡因组和罗哌卡因组在性别、年龄、身高、体重和疼痛持续时间方面差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。治疗前两组 VAS 和 SAS 评分差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。超声引导 SGB 治疗后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月,罗哌卡因组 VAS 和 SAS 评分均明显低于利多卡因组(P<.05)。两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。
对于超声引导 SGB 治疗上肢 PHN,罗哌卡因优于利多卡因。超声引导罗哌卡因 SGB 治疗上肢 PHN 安全有效。