Kang Hee Yong, Lee Chung Hun, Choi Sang Sik, Lee Mi Kyoung, Park Jong Sun, Oh Jung Suk
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Dongdaemun-Gu.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Guro-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20298. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020298.
Continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) using local anesthetics is frequently used to control herpes zoster pain and prevent postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, few studies have been conducted to determine the efficacy of epidural drugs administered as CEA to manage PHN. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CEA with ropivacaine alone or with ropivacaine and fentanyl for controlling pain caused by PHN.We reviewed the medical records of 71 patients. We studied 2 groups: epidural ropivacaine (ER; CEA with ropivacaine alone; n = 44) and epidural ropivacaine and fentanyl (Epidural ropivacaine and fentanyl (ERF); CEA with ropivacaine and fentanyl; n = 27). To evaluate pain, a numeric rating scale (NRS) was evaluated at 6 time points: immediately before the procedure (baseline NRS score); 1 hour after the procedure; 14 days after the procedure; and 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Complication rates were recorded during CEA. We also investigated whether additional invasive procedures were needed due to insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up period.After adjusting for confounding variables, there were no significant differences in the NRS scores between the 2 groups at any time point. The adjusted odds ratio for additional invasive procedures within 6 months after CEA was 1.03-times higher in the ERF group than in the ER group, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 0.33-3.23, P = .96). Rates of complication (dysuria, vomiting, nausea, itching sensation, and hypotension) during CEA were higher in the ERF group than in the ER group. However, the differences were not statistically significant.There was no difference in the management of pain in patients with PHN between the groups. Epidural administration of fentanyl with ropivacaine did not improve pain management when compared to ropivacaine alone. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of complications during CEA was higher in the opioid combination group.
使用局部麻醉药的连续硬膜外镇痛(CEA)常用于控制带状疱疹疼痛并预防带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)。然而,很少有研究来确定作为CEA给药的硬膜外药物治疗PHN的疗效。这项回顾性研究旨在评估单独使用罗哌卡因或罗哌卡因与芬太尼联合进行CEA控制PHN所致疼痛的有效性。我们回顾了71例患者的病历。我们研究了2组:硬膜外罗哌卡因组(ER;单独使用罗哌卡因进行CEA;n = 44)和硬膜外罗哌卡因与芬太尼组(硬膜外罗哌卡因与芬太尼组(ERF);罗哌卡因与芬太尼联合进行CEA;n = 27)。为了评估疼痛,在6个时间点采用数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估:手术前即刻(基线NRS评分);手术后1小时;手术后14天;以及手术后1、3和6个月。记录CEA期间的并发症发生率。我们还调查了在6个月随访期内是否因疼痛控制不足而需要额外的侵入性操作。在调整混杂变量后,两组在任何时间点的NRS评分均无显著差异。CEA后6个月内进行额外侵入性操作的调整比值比在ERF组比ER组高1.03倍,但这种差异无统计学意义(95%置信区间:0.33 - 3.23,P = 0.96)。ERF组CEA期间的并发症(排尿困难、呕吐、恶心、瘙痒感和低血压)发生率高于ER组。然而,差异无统计学意义。两组PHN患者的疼痛管理无差异。与单独使用罗哌卡因相比,罗哌卡因与芬太尼联合硬膜外给药并未改善疼痛管理。虽然无统计学意义,但阿片类药物联合组CEA期间的并发症发生率更高。