• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适应软传感技术在污水处理运行和风险管理中的河流流量预测。

Adaptive soft sensing of river flow prediction for wastewater treatment operation and risk management.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.

School of Engineering and Applied Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.

出版信息

Water Res. 2022 Jul 15;220:118714. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118714. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118714
PMID:35687977
Abstract

Many wastewater utilities have discharge permits directly tied with the receiving river flow, so it is critical to have accurate prediction of the hydraulic throughput to ensure safe operation and environment protection. Current empirical knowledge-based operation faces many challenges, so in this study we developed and assessed daily-adaptive, probabilistic soft sensor prediction models to forecast the next month's average receiving river flowrate and guide the utility operations. By comparing 11 machine-learning methods, extra trees regression exhibits desired deterministic prediction accuracy at day 0 (overall accuracy index: 3.9 × 10 1/cms) (cms: cubic meter per second), which also increases steadily over the course of the month (e.g., MAPE and RMSE decrease from 41.46% and 23.31 cms to 3.31% and 2.81 cms, respectively). The overall classification accuracy of three river flow classes reaches 0.79 at the beginning and increases to about 0.97 over the course of the predicted month. To manage the uncertainty caused by potential false negative classification as overestimations, a probabilistic assessment on the predictions based on 95% lower PI is developed and successfully reduces the false negative classification from 17% to nearly zero with a slight sacrifice of overall classification accuracy.

摘要

许多废水处理厂的排放许可证直接与接收河流流量挂钩,因此准确预测水力吞吐量对于确保安全运行和环境保护至关重要。当前基于经验知识的运行面临着许多挑战,因此在本研究中,我们开发并评估了每日自适应的概率软传感器预测模型,以预测下一个月的平均接收河流量,并指导公用事业的运营。通过比较 11 种机器学习方法,决策树回归在第 0 天(整体精度指标:3.9×10 1/cms)(cms:立方米每秒)表现出理想的确定性预测精度,并且在整个月内稳步提高(例如,平均绝对百分比误差和均方根误差分别从 41.46%和 23.31cms 降低到 3.31%和 2.81cms)。在预测月开始时,三种河流水流等级的整体分类准确率达到 0.79,并在预测月内增加到约 0.97。为了管理潜在的误报高估引起的不确定性,基于 95%的下 PI 对预测进行了概率评估,并成功地将误报分类从 17%降低到几乎为零,而整体分类准确率略有下降。

相似文献

1
Adaptive soft sensing of river flow prediction for wastewater treatment operation and risk management.自适应软传感技术在污水处理运行和风险管理中的河流流量预测。
Water Res. 2022 Jul 15;220:118714. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118714. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
2
Comparing linear and non-linear data-driven approaches in monthly river flow prediction, based on the models SARIMA, LSSVM, ANFIS, and GMDH.基于 SARIMA、LSSVM、ANFIS 和 GMDH 模型,比较月度河川流量预测中的线性和非线性数据驱动方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):21935-21954. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17443-0. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
3
Real-time prediction of river chloride concentration using ensemble learning.基于集成学习的河流水氯浓度实时预测。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Dec 15;291:118116. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118116. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Comparison of the performance of decision tree (DT) algorithms and extreme learning machine (ELM) model in the prediction of water quality of the Upper Green River watershed.决策树(DT)算法和极限学习机(ELM)模型在预测上格林河流域水质方面的性能比较。
Water Environ Res. 2021 Nov;93(11):2360-2373. doi: 10.1002/wer.1642. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Newly explored machine learning model for river flow time series forecasting at Mary River, Australia.新探索的机器学习模型在澳大利亚玛丽河的河流流量时间序列预测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Nov 14;192(12):761. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08724-1.
6
Assessing the performance of a suite of machine learning models for daily river water temperature prediction.评估一组用于每日河流水温预测的机器学习模型的性能。
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 4;7:e7065. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7065. eCollection 2019.
7
Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry.利用卫星图像和多站点水力学几何法进行全球河流径流量测绘。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):4788-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317606111. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
8
Development of river ecosystem models for Flemish watercourses: case studies in the Zwalm river basin.佛兰德水道河流生态系统模型的开发:兹瓦尔姆河流域的案例研究
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet. 2001;66(1):71-86.
9
Modeling daily water temperature for rivers: comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks models.河流日水温建模:自适应神经模糊推理系统与人工神经网络模型的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):402-420. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3650-2. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Water quality assessment of a river using deep learning Bi-LSTM methodology: forecasting and validation.基于深度学习 Bi-LSTM 方法的河流水质评估:预测与验证。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):12875-12889. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13875-w. Epub 2021 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effluent quality soft sensor for wastewater treatment plant with ensemble sparse learning-based online next generation reservoir computing.基于集成稀疏学习的在线下一代储层计算的污水处理厂出水水质软传感器
Water Res X. 2024 Nov 10;25:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100276. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.