• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告 ClinicalTrials.gov 上主协议研究设计的方法:定性分析。

Approach for reporting master protocol study designs on ClinicalTrials.gov: qualitative analysis.

机构信息

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

出版信息

BMJ. 2022 Jun 10;377:e067745. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067745.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2021-067745
PMID:35688481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9186156/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe an approach for reporting master protocol research programs (MPRPs) that is consistent with existing good reporting practices and that uses structured information to convey the overall master protocol and design of each substudy.

DESIGN

Qualitative analysis.

DATA SOURCES

ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Established goals and related practices of the trial reporting system were outlined, examples and key characteristics of MPRPs were reviewed, and specific challenges in registering and reporting summary results to databases designed for traditional clinical trial designs that rely on a model of one study per protocol were identified.

RESULTS

A reporting approach is proposed that accommodates the complex study design of MPRPs and their results. This approach involves the use of separate registration records for each substudy within one MPRP protocol (with potential exceptions noted).

CONCLUSIONS

How the proposed approach allows for clear, descriptive, structured information about each substudy's prespecified design and supports timely reporting of results after completion of each substudy is described and illustrated. Although the focus is on reporting to ClinicalTrials.gov, the approach supports broader application across trial registries and results databases. This paper is intended to stimulate further discussion of this approach among stakeholders, build awareness about the need to improve reporting of MPRPs, and encourage harmonization across trial registries globally.

摘要

目的

描述一种与现有良好报告实践一致的报告主方案研究计划(MPRP)的方法,并使用结构化信息传达总体主方案和每个子研究的设计。

设计

定性分析。

数据来源

ClinicalTrials.gov 试验注册库。

主要观察指标

概述了试验报告系统的既定目标和相关实践,回顾了 MPRP 的示例和关键特征,并确定了在向依赖于一个协议对应一个研究的传统临床试验设计模型的数据库注册和报告汇总结果方面的具体挑战。

结果

提出了一种报告方法,适应 MPRP 及其结果的复杂研究设计。该方法涉及在一个 MPRP 协议内为每个子研究使用单独的注册记录(注意潜在的例外情况)。

结论

描述并说明了所提出的方法如何允许对每个子研究的预定设计进行清晰、描述性、结构化的信息,并支持在每个子研究完成后及时报告结果。尽管重点是向 ClinicalTrials.gov 报告,但该方法支持在试验注册库和结果数据库中更广泛的应用。本文旨在激发利益相关者对该方法的进一步讨论,提高对 MPRP 报告改进的认识,并鼓励在全球范围内的试验注册库之间实现协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bd/9186156/6d5d14a48198/wilr067745.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bd/9186156/6d5d14a48198/wilr067745.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bd/9186156/6d5d14a48198/wilr067745.f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Approach for reporting master protocol study designs on ClinicalTrials.gov: qualitative analysis.报告 ClinicalTrials.gov 上主协议研究设计的方法:定性分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jun 10;377:e067745. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067745.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.注册后临床试验的发布:一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
5
Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries.同行评议出版物与临床试验注册库之间的一致性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):552-556. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0312.
6
Characteristics of clinical trials associated with early results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.ClinicalTrials.gov 上与早期结果报告相关的临床试验特征。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;117:106785. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106785. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册可以补充系统评价摘要中的信息:一项比较研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 18;13:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-79.
8
Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study.临床实验结果在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的强制性报告遵守情况:横断面研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7373.
9
Prevalence of clinical trial status discrepancies: A cross-sectional study of 10,492 trials registered on both ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register.临床试验状态差异的流行率:一项在 ClinicalTrials.gov 和欧盟临床试验注册中心登记的 10492 项试验的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193088. eCollection 2018.
10
Patient preferences when searching for clinical trials and adherence of study records to ClinicalTrials.gov guidance in key registry data fields.患者在搜索临床试验时的偏好以及研究记录对关键注册数据字段中 ClinicalTrials.gov 指南的依从性。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233294. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?登记或随机分组——这一定是有依据的,还是可能只是巧合?
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Jun 26;10(2):65-71. doi: 10.1515/iss-2022-0028. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
An efficient vaccine clinical trial: ACTG A5379 hepatitis B vaccine trial in persons with HIV.一项高效的疫苗临床试验:美国国立过敏和传染病研究所艾滋病临床试验组A5379号针对HIV感染者的乙肝疫苗试验
Vaccine. 2025 May 10;55:127028. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127028. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3
Seamless trials in oncology: A cross-sectional analysis of characteristics and reporting.

本文引用的文献

1
Platform Trials - Beware the Noncomparable Control Group.平台试验——谨防不可比的对照组。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1572-1573. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2102446.
2
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.地塞米松在 COVID-19 住院患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
The Evolution of Master Protocol Clinical Trial Designs: A Systematic Literature Review.主方案临床试验设计的演变:一项系统文献综述
肿瘤学中的无缝试验:特征与报告的横断面分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 3;19(12):e0312797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312797. eCollection 2024.
Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1330-1360. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV): An Unprecedented Partnership for Unprecedented Times.加速COVID-19治疗干预和疫苗(ACTIV):应对前所未有的时代的前所未有的合作。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2455-2457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8920.
5
An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians.精准肿瘤篮子和伞式试验概述——临床医生视角
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Mar;70(2):125-137. doi: 10.3322/caac.21600. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
6
Trametinib Activity in Patients with Solid Tumors and Lymphomas Harboring BRAF Non-V600 Mutations or Fusions: Results from NCI-MATCH (EAY131).曲美替尼在携带 BRAF 非 V600 突变或融合的实体瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的活性:NCI-MATCH(EAY131)的结果。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;26(8):1812-1819. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3443. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
10-Year Update on Study Results Submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov.提交至ClinicalTrials.gov的研究结果的10年更新
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 14;381(20):1966-1974. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1907644.
8
Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols.系统评价篮子试验、伞式试验和平台试验:主方案的全景分析。
Trials. 2019 Sep 18;20(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1.
9
Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations.适应性平台试验:定义、设计、实施和报告考虑因素。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Oct;18(10):797-807. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0034-3. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Biostatistical and Logistical Considerations in the Development of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trials.篮子试验和伞式试验设计中的统计学和后勤学考虑。
Cancer J. 2019 Jul/Aug;25(4):254-263. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000384.