• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项高效的疫苗临床试验:美国国立过敏和传染病研究所艾滋病临床试验组A5379号针对HIV感染者的乙肝疫苗试验

An efficient vaccine clinical trial: ACTG A5379 hepatitis B vaccine trial in persons with HIV.

作者信息

Kang Minhee, Marks Kristen M, Cox Andrea L, Sherman Kenneth E

机构信息

Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research in the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2025 May 10;55:127028. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127028. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127028
PMID:40147293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12078002/
Abstract

Clinical trial designs that address multiple questions more efficiently are desirable. When we designed a hepatitis B vaccine trial to assess seroprotective outcomes in persons with HIV (PWH), we aimed for an efficient design that addressed three primary objectives in two study populations. The study focused on: PWH who did not respond to prior HBV vaccination, and PWH with no known history of HBV vaccination. Whereas one vaccine regimen was studied in the vaccine-naïve participants, multiple interventions were considered for those with prior nonresponse, with two different vaccines and two dosing schedules. Several features of the trial design required statistical considerations related to multiple testing: (1) assessment of vaccine response in two study populations under one trial, (2) comparisons among multiple treatment arms, and (3) sequential repeated significance tests in interim data monitoring. We describe the features aimed to gain statistical and administrative efficiencies, including reduction in the study sample size of 12 %. We also describe how we controlled type I error and planned interim data monitoring, and highlight the time lag issue due to the laboratory-based immunogenicity endpoint in this international, multi-center trial (NCT04193189).

摘要

更高效地解决多个问题的临床试验设计是很有必要的。当我们设计一项乙型肝炎疫苗试验以评估艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)的血清保护结果时,我们旨在设计一种高效的试验,在两个研究人群中实现三个主要目标。该研究聚焦于:对先前乙肝疫苗接种无反应的艾滋病毒感染者,以及无乙肝疫苗接种史的艾滋病毒感染者。在未接种过疫苗的参与者中研究了一种疫苗方案,而对于先前无反应者则考虑了多种干预措施,包括两种不同的疫苗和两种给药方案。试验设计的几个特点需要进行与多重检验相关的统计考量:(1)在一项试验中对两个研究人群的疫苗反应进行评估;(2)多个治疗组之间的比较;(3)在中期数据监测中进行序贯重复显著性检验。我们描述了旨在提高统计和管理效率的特点,包括将研究样本量减少12%。我们还描述了我们如何控制I型错误并计划中期数据监测,并强调了在这项国际多中心试验(NCT04193189)中由于基于实验室的免疫原性终点导致的时间滞后问题。

相似文献

1
An efficient vaccine clinical trial: ACTG A5379 hepatitis B vaccine trial in persons with HIV.一项高效的疫苗临床试验:美国国立过敏和传染病研究所艾滋病临床试验组A5379号针对HIV感染者的乙肝疫苗试验
Vaccine. 2025 May 10;55:127028. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127028. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
HepB-CpG vs HepB-Alum Vaccine in People With HIV and Prior Vaccine Nonresponse: The BEe-HIVe Randomized Clinical Trial.乙肝-CpG疫苗与乙肝-铝盐疫苗在HIV感染者及既往疫苗无应答者中的比较:BEe-HIVe随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):295-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24490.
3
Combined DTP-HBV-HIB vaccine versus separately administered DTP-HBV and HIB vaccines for primary prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B (HIB).白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)联合疫苗与分别接种白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎疫苗和HIB疫苗用于白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD005530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005530.pub3.
4
Pharmacological interventions for acute hepatitis B infection: an attempted network meta-analysis.急性乙型肝炎感染的药物干预:一项网状Meta分析尝试
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3(3):CD011645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011645.pub2.
5
Booster dose vaccination for preventing hepatitis B.预防乙型肝炎的加强剂量疫苗接种。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;2016(6):CD008256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008256.pub3.
6
Combined DTP-HBV-HIB vaccine versus separately administered DTP-HBV and HIB vaccines for primary prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B (HIB).白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)联合疫苗与分别接种白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎疫苗和HIB疫苗用于白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和B型流感嗜血杆菌(HIB)的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD005530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005530.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
8
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3.
9
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
10
Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年疫苗接种程序的针头尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 18(6):CD010720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010720.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
HepB-CpG vs HepB-Alum Vaccine in People With HIV and Prior Vaccine Nonresponse: The BEe-HIVe Randomized Clinical Trial.乙肝-CpG疫苗与乙肝-铝盐疫苗在HIV感染者及既往疫苗无应答者中的比较:BEe-HIVe随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):295-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24490.
2
Immunogenicity and Safety of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Vaccine With a Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Adjuvant in HBV Vaccine-Naïve People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.HBV 疫苗加 TLR9 佐剂在 HIV 初免人群中的免疫原性和安全性
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 14;77(3):414-418. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad201.
3
Immune Responses to HBV Vaccine in People Living with HIV (PLWHs) Who Achieved Successful Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study.对接受成功治疗的HIV感染者(PLWHs)的乙肝疫苗免疫反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(2):400. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020400.
4
Group sequential methods for interim monitoring of randomized clinical trials with time-lagged outcome.具有时滞结局的随机临床试验的期中监测的分组序贯方法。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 10;41(28):5517-5536. doi: 10.1002/sim.9580. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
5
Economic Evaluation of Cost and Time Required for a Platform Trial vs Conventional Trials.平台试验与传统试验的成本和所需时间的经济评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2221140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21140.
6
Approach for reporting master protocol study designs on ClinicalTrials.gov: qualitative analysis.报告 ClinicalTrials.gov 上主协议研究设计的方法:定性分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jun 10;377:e067745. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067745.
7
Multiplicity adjustments in parallel-group multi-arm trials sharing a control group: Clear guidance is needed.在共享对照组的平行组多臂试验中进行多样性调整:需要明确的指导。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106656. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106656. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Practical Considerations and Recommendations for Master Protocol Framework: Basket, Umbrella and Platform Trials.实用考量与建议:主方案框架(篮子试验、伞式试验、平台试验)
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Nov;55(6):1145-1154. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00315-7. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
A web application for the design of multi-arm clinical trials.一个用于设计多臂临床试验的网络应用程序。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6525-0.
10
Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations.适应性平台试验:定义、设计、实施和报告考虑因素。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Oct;18(10):797-807. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0034-3. Epub 2019 Aug 28.