Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):e056400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400.
The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach.
Qualitative descriptive study.
A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation.
26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents.
Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format.
To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation.
Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs.
等级评定、评估、制定与评价工作组最近开发了一种创新性方法,通过最小程度和部分情境化的方法来解释网络荟萃分析(NMA)的结果;然而,使用这种方法呈现多个结局结果的最佳方法仍不确定。因此,我们开发并迭代修改了一种呈现方法,该方法使用这种新的解释方法为临床医生有效总结 NMA 的多个结局结果。
定性描述性研究。
一个由 7 名具有 NMA 和设计验证研究经验的人员组成的指导小组为评估开发了两种颜色编码的呈现格式。通过一个迭代过程,我们评估了这两种格式的有效性,以最大限度地提高其清晰度和易于解释性。
26 名参与者,包括 20 名经常提供患者护理的临床医生、3 名研究人员/研究方法学家和 3 名住院医师。
两名团队成员使用定性内容分析方法,分别对所有访谈的记录进行独立分析。指导小组审查了分析结果,并对呈现格式进行了一系列修改。
为了确保读者能够轻松辨别每个纳入治疗在所有评估结局中的获益和安全性,参与者主要关注简单的信息呈现,采用直观的组织决策和颜色编码。反馈最终导致了两种呈现版本,每种版本都得到了相当一部分参与者的青睐,并开发了一个图例来帮助解释。
迭代设计验证促进了为多个结局呈现最小程度或部分情境化 NMA 结果的两种新格式的开发。这些呈现方法吸引了对 NMA 不太熟悉的临床医生等受众。