Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1 Canada.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1 Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Aug;105(8):6809-6819. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21349. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
This review synthesizes research findings on the pain and welfare of dairy calves undergoing disbudding procedures. We describe disbudding practices in North America as well as the use and perceptions of pain control for these procedures. Governing bodies across Canada and the United States, including each country's veterinary medical association and nationwide initiatives such as proAction and Farmers Assuring Responsible Management (FARM), recommend or require the use of a local anesthetic, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and a sedative for disbudding procedures. Although the use of pain relief for disbudding has increased over the past decade or so, some in the dairy industry still do not believe that pain control for disbudding is necessary. As a painful procedure, disbudding has numerous welfare impacts on the calf both during and following the procedure that can be categorized under all 3 principles of animal welfare: natural living, biological functioning, and affective state. The use of pain control for disbudding; namely, a local anesthetic and NSAID, can improve welfare outcomes such as procedure-induced pain behavior, cortisol concentrations, mechanical nociceptive threshold, emotional states, and so on, compared with no pain control for the procedure. Although extensive research exists on pain control practices for disbudding, this review identified further gaps in knowledge and areas for future research. Mechanical nociceptive threshold can be evaluated around the disbudding wounds and is a reliable test in older calves; however, this outcome in very young calves after caustic paste disbudding has been reported to be inconclusive compared with that in older calves. As well, research evaluating xylazine sedation for disbudding has reported both potentially positive and negative results that are difficult to interpret or base suggestions on for the use of this drug. Finally, wounds caused by disbudding take a long time to heal (up to 13 wk) and have increased sensitivity for the entire healing process. Therefore, future research should aim to (1) determine accurate behavioral tests for calves under 1 wk of age undergoing disbudding to better understand their experience, (2) further attempt to understand the effects of xylazine sedation for disbudding and potential impacts of providing this medication, and (3) determine more ways to reduce the healing time and pain experienced by the calf after disbudding procedures.
这篇综述综合了有关犊牛去角手术过程中疼痛和福利的研究结果。我们描述了北美的去角操作以及这些操作中疼痛控制的使用和认知。加拿大和美国的监管机构,包括每个国家的兽医协会以及 proAction 和 Farmers Assuring Responsible Management (FARM) 等全国性倡议,都建议或要求在去角操作中使用局部麻醉剂、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和镇静剂。尽管在过去十年左右,去角操作中使用疼痛缓解的情况有所增加,但一些奶制品行业的人仍然认为去角操作不需要疼痛控制。作为一种痛苦的手术,去角对犊牛在手术过程中和手术后都有许多福利影响,可以归为动物福利的三个原则:自然生活、生物功能和情感状态。与没有疼痛控制相比,去角操作中使用疼痛控制,即局部麻醉剂和 NSAID,可以改善手术引起的疼痛行为、皮质醇浓度、机械痛觉阈值、情绪等方面的福利结果。尽管有大量关于去角疼痛控制的研究,但本综述确定了知识的进一步差距和未来研究的领域。可以在去角伤口周围评估机械性痛觉阈值,并且在较年长的犊牛中是一种可靠的测试;然而,与较年长的犊牛相比,腐蚀性糊剂去角后非常年幼的犊牛的这种结果据报道是不确定的。此外,评估二甲苯胺嗪镇静用于去角的研究报告了一些难以解释或基于此药物使用建议的可能积极和消极结果。最后,去角造成的伤口需要很长时间才能愈合(长达 13 周),并且在整个愈合过程中都有更高的敏感性。因此,未来的研究应旨在:(1)确定 1 周龄以下犊牛去角时的准确行为测试,以更好地了解它们的体验;(2)进一步尝试了解二甲苯胺嗪镇静对去角的影响以及提供这种药物的潜在影响;(3)确定更多减少犊牛去角手术后愈合时间和疼痛的方法。