Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Curriculum & Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023 Feb;15(1):115-132. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12379. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine has been implemented as a physical distancing measure to reduce the risk of transmission. However, no studies have examined the relationship between quarantine and daily affective experiences. Few studies have examined the individual-level factors that may alleviate or strengthen the negative impact of quarantine on daily affective experiences. To this end, we conducted a diary study by comparing the affective experiences of people in quarantine with those of people not subject to quarantine. There were 201 participants in the study. After the pretest collecting responses on demographic information and entity theory of emotion, the participants completed a daily questionnaire measuring their daily positive and negative affect for 14 consecutive days. The results of hierarchical linear modeling showed that the participants in the quarantine condition reported less daily positive affect than those in the social interaction condition. We found that when the participants under quarantine believed more strongly that their emotions could not be changed, they reported a higher level of daily negative affect. These findings demonstrate the role of entity theory of emotion in understanding daily negative affect during quarantine.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,隔离被作为一种物理距离措施来实施,以降低传播的风险。然而,目前还没有研究检查隔离与日常情感体验之间的关系。很少有研究探讨可能减轻或增强隔离对日常情感体验的负面影响的个体因素。为此,我们通过比较处于隔离状态的人和不受隔离的人的情感体验,进行了一项日记研究。该研究共有 201 名参与者。在预测试收集人口统计信息和情感实体理论的回答后,参与者连续 14 天完成了一项日常问卷,以测量他们的日常积极和消极情绪。分层线性建模的结果表明,处于隔离状态的参与者报告的日常积极情绪比处于社会互动状态的参与者少。我们发现,当处于隔离状态的参与者更强烈地认为他们的情绪无法改变时,他们报告的日常消极情绪水平更高。这些发现表明情感实体理论在理解隔离期间的日常消极情绪方面发挥了作用。