Suppr超能文献

药物治疗与微创治疗作为中重度良性前列腺增生初始治疗方法的成本效益研究

Pharmacotherapy vs. minimally invasive therapies as initial therapy for moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia: a cost-effectiveness study.

作者信息

Sahakyan Yeva, Erman Aysegul, Bhojani Naeem, Chughtai Bilal, Zorn Kevin C, Sander Beate, Elterman Dean S

机构信息

Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Mar;26(1):113-118. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00561-2. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, minimally invasive therapies (MITs), such as water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) and prostatic urethral lift (PUL) have become an alternative to surgery or pharmacotherapy to manage benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), offering symptom relief with a favorable safety profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of MITs (WVTT and PUL) compared to pharmacotherapy as initial treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe BPH.

METHODS

In this model-based economic evaluation we simulated BPH progression in men (mean age 65 years, average International Prostate Symptom Score 16.6) over their lifetime and estimated healthcare costs (from the US public payer perspective) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), discounted at 3% annually. Various clinical scenarios were evaluated given that most men undergo several lifelong therapies up to surgical intervention and potentially thereafter. As such, in the study model men could receive up to three lines of therapy: (1) initial pharmacotherapy with MIT as second-line, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or pharmacotherapy as third-line; (2) initial MIT (WVTT or PUL) with MIT again, TURP or pharmacotherapy as second-line, and TURP as third-line. Model was populated using data from the published literature. Probabilistic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Initial treatment with WVTT led to the highest QALYs (13.05) and the lowest cost ($15,461). The cumulative QALYs and lifetime costs were 12.92 QALYs and $20,280 for pharmacotherapy followed by WVTT, 12.87 QALYs and $22,424 for pharmacotherapy followed by PUL, 12.86 QALYs and $20,930 for initial treatment with PUL. In the cost-utility analysis, WVTT as initial treatment dominated all three strategies, i.e., generated more QALYs at a lower cost.

CONCLUSION

WVTT is an effective and cost-saving procedure, and may be an appropriate first-line alternative to pharmacotherapy for moderate-to-severe BPH patients who seek faster improvement and no lifelong commitment to daily medications.

摘要

背景

最近,诸如水蒸气热疗法(WVTT)和前列腺尿道悬吊术(PUL)等微创治疗(MITs)已成为治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的手术或药物治疗的替代方法,可缓解症状且安全性良好。本研究的目的是评估与药物治疗相比,MITs(WVTT和PUL)作为中重度BPH患者初始治疗的成本效益。

方法

在这项基于模型的经济评估中,我们模拟了男性(平均年龄65岁,平均国际前列腺症状评分16.6)一生中BPH的进展情况,并估计了每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的医疗成本(从美国公共支付者的角度),按每年3%的贴现率贴现。考虑到大多数男性在接受手术干预之前可能会接受多种终身治疗,因此评估了各种临床情况。因此,在研究模型中,男性最多可接受三线治疗:(1)初始药物治疗,二线为MIT,三线为经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)或药物治疗;(2)初始MIT(WVTT或PUL),二线为MIT、TURP或药物治疗,三线为TURP。模型使用已发表文献中的数据填充。进行了概率分析。

结果

WVTT初始治疗导致最高的QALY(13.05)和最低的成本(15461美元)。药物治疗后再进行WVTT的累积QALY和终身成本分别为12.92 QALY和20280美元,药物治疗后再进行PUL的累积QALY和终身成本分别为12.87 QALY和22424美元,PUL初始治疗的累积QALY和终身成本分别为12.86 QALY和20930美元。在成本效益分析中,WVTT作为初始治疗优于所有三种策略,即以较低成本产生更多的QALY。

结论

WVTT是一种有效且节省成本的治疗方法,对于寻求更快改善且无需终身每日服药的中重度BPH患者,可能是药物治疗的合适一线替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验