• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检查表在多学科轮诊中提高儿科重症监护病房患者安全性的有效性:系统评价方案。

Effectiveness of checklists in multidisciplinary rounds for improving patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

School of Nursing and Midwifery and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Jul 1;20(7):1835-1841. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00180.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-21-00180
PMID:35689174
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review will evaluate the effectiveness of checklist use in multidisciplinary rounds, compared with multidisciplinary rounds without checklists, for improving mortality and patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION

Single studies have demonstrated that checklists can potentially improve communication of care between health professionals, reduce adverse events, and increase adherence to best practice guidelines. However, no systematic review of the literature has explored the use of checklists in the pediatric intensive care unit.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider studies that include pediatric patients, under 18 years of age, admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. Identified studies will compare the use of checklists in multidisciplinary rounds with multidisciplinary rounds with no checklists. The studies will also evaluate mortality and patient safety outcomes. We will consider experimental and observational studies, published in any language, with no date restrictions.

METHODS

The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished studies. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Epistemonikos. The studies will be screened and those meeting the inclusion criteria will be retained by two independent researchers. Assessment of methodology and data extraction will then be carried out. The data will be presented using a narrative synthesis and the studies will be pooled with a statistical meta-analysis, where possible.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021233798.

摘要

目的

本综述将评估多学科轮诊中使用检查表与不使用检查表相比,对改善儿科重症监护病房死亡率和患者安全性的有效性。

简介

已有研究表明,检查表可潜在改善医护人员间的护理沟通,减少不良事件,并提高对最佳实践指南的依从性。然而,尚无系统评价探讨检查表在儿科重症监护病房的使用。

纳入标准

本综述将纳入年龄在 18 岁以下、收治于儿科重症监护病房的儿科患者的研究。所识别的研究将比较多学科轮诊中使用检查表与不使用检查表的情况。这些研究还将评估死亡率和患者安全性结局。我们将考虑实验和观察性研究,发表于任何语言,无时间限制。

方法

搜索策略旨在定位已发表和未发表的研究。将搜索的数据库包括 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、LILACS、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL、综述传播中心、效果摘要数据库和 Epistemonikos。将对研究进行筛选,由两名独立研究人员保留符合纳入标准的研究。然后将进行方法学评估和数据提取。将使用叙述性综合法呈现数据,并在可能的情况下对研究进行汇总进行统计荟萃分析。

系统评价注册编号

PROSPERO CRD42021233798。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of checklists in multidisciplinary rounds for improving patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol.检查表在多学科轮诊中提高儿科重症监护病房患者安全性的有效性:系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Jul 1;20(7):1835-1841. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00180.
2
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
3
Effectiveness of high vs lower enteral protein intake, considering energy intake, on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: a systematic review protocol.考虑能量摄入时,高 vs 较低肠内蛋白质摄入对危重症儿童临床结局的影响:系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Jun 1;21(6):1251-1258. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00133.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review protocol.重症监护病房医护人员在临床医生交接班时让家属参与的体验:一项定性系统评价研究方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Aug 1;20(8):2048-2054. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00310.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Cost-effectiveness of home care services versus hospital care for pediatric patients worldwide: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.全球儿科患者家庭护理服务与医院护理的成本效益比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 14;101(41):e30993. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030993.
8
A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study.一份用于跨专业查房的儿科重症监护检查表:R-PICniC研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Sep 1;31(5):383-389. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022533.
9
Can Checklists Solve Our Ward Round Woes? A Systematic Review.清单能否解决我们的病房查房难题?系统评价。
World J Surg. 2022 Oct;46(10):2355-2364. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06635-5. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
10
Impact of Rounding Checklists on the Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.集束化核对表对 ICU 患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 20;6(8):e1140. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001140. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.