• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房医护人员在临床医生交接班时让家属参与的体验:一项定性系统评价研究方案。

Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia.

Western Australian Group for Evidence Informed Healthcare Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Aug 1;20(8):2048-2054. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00310.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-21-00310
PMID:35689175
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review will evaluate the experiences of health care professionals in the intensive care unit when families participate in clinician handovers.

INTRODUCTION

Families of patients admitted to the intensive care unit report stress and anxiety. Family participation in multidisciplinary rounds in the intensive care unit may improve patient and family outcomes. However, health care professionals have different attitudes toward family participation. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of the barriers, facilitators, and other outcomes of family participation in clinician handovers for the patient, family, and health care professionals.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will consider studies involving health care professionals (eg, nurses, physicians, allied health professionals) and any type of family participation, from bedside presence to participation in decision-making. Clinician handovers may be multidisciplinary ward rounds or nursing handovers. Settings may be the adult, pediatric, or neonatal intensive care unit in rural or metropolitan regions in any country. Studies in other clinical contexts will be excluded.

METHODS

Databases to be searched include CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and ProQuest Central. The search will be limited to articles written in English from 2000 to the present. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, assess the full text of selected citations for inclusion, and assess methodological quality. A data extraction tool will be used, and findings will be assigned a level of credibility. Meta-aggregation will be used to synthesize findings. Disagreements between reviewers will be discussed to reach consensus; a third reviewer will be consulted if necessary.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020223011.

摘要

目的

本综述将评估重症监护病房医护人员在临床医生交接班时让家属参与的体验。

引言

入住重症监护病房的患者家属报告存在压力和焦虑。让家属参与重症监护多学科查房可能会改善患者和家属的结局。然而,医护人员对家属参与有不同的态度。此外,对于家属参与临床医生交接班对患者、家属和医护人员的障碍、促进因素和其他结果,了解有限。

纳入标准

综述将考虑涉及医护人员(例如护士、医生、专职医疗人员)的研究,以及任何类型的家属参与,从床边陪伴到参与决策。临床医生交接班可以是多学科的病房查房或护理交接班。设置可以是在任何国家的农村或城市地区的成人、儿科或新生儿重症监护病房。将排除其他临床环境下的研究。

方法

将搜索的数据库包括 CINAHL、MEDLINE、Scopus、PsycINFO、Embase、Emcare、Web of Science 和 ProQuest Central。搜索将限于 2000 年至今发表的英文文章。两名独立的审查员将筛选标题和摘要,评估选定引文的全文是否纳入,并评估方法学质量。将使用数据提取工具,并将研究结果分配可信度级别。将采用元聚合来综合研究结果。如果审查员之间存在分歧,将进行讨论以达成共识;必要时将咨询第三位审查员。

系统评价注册编号

PROSPERO CRD42020223011。

相似文献

1
Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review protocol.重症监护病房医护人员在临床医生交接班时让家属参与的体验:一项定性系统评价研究方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Aug 1;20(8):2048-2054. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00310.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Patient, family and nurse experiences with patient presence during handovers in acute care hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.急性护理医院环境中交接班时患者在场的患者、家属及护士体验:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 May;17(5):754-792. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003737.
7
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
8
Effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: a mixed methods systematic review.干预措施促进家庭与儿科和新生儿重症监护病房之间建立伙伴关系的效果和家庭体验:一项混合方法系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Jul 1;22(7):1208-1261. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00034.
9
Family ward rounds in intensive care: An integrative review of the literature.重症监护病房的家庭查房:文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103771. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103771. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.

引用本文的文献

1
Handoffs and transitions of care in the intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.重症监护病房的护理交接与过渡:美国创伤外科协会危重症护理委员会临床共识文件
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Feb 17;10(1):e001677. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001677. eCollection 2025.