The State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Beijing Challenge Group Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100081, China.
Poult Sci. 2022 Aug;101(8):101954. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101954. Epub 2022 May 6.
The objective of this study was to compare the digestibility of energy and fatty acids (FA) in rice bran oil (RBO) and palm oil (PO) fed to growing Arbor Acre (AA) broilers. A corn-soybean meal basal diet and the basal diet supplemented with 8% RBO or PO were evaluated. A total of 72 AA male broilers (initial BW = 1,173 ± 6 g; age = 22 d) were randomly divided to 3 dietary treatments with 6 replicates of 4 broilers in each. The growth performance and the ME and FA digestibility in oils were compared with a balance experiment of broilers from d 22 to 28. The ME of the RBO diet was greater (P < 0.05) than PO diet and basal diet, and the ME of the PO diet was greater (P < 0.05) than basal diet. However, no statistical difference was observed in the ME intake of broilers fed basal, RBO, and PO diets. To maintain daily ME intake, broilers ingested more basal diet relative to other diets, resulting in increased CP intake (P < 0.01) and retention (P < 0.01) than broilers fed diets supplemented with RBO and PO. This finding resulted in greater (P < 0.01) BWG and ADG from d 22 to 28 for broilers fed the basal diet relative to other diets, but there was no difference for BWG and ADG across oil sources. However, broilers fed RBO had numerically greater BWD and ADG than those fed PO, likely because the RBO provided greater AME, AMEn, AME/GE, AMEn/GE (P < 0.01) as well as ether extract (EE) digestibility (P = 0.0536) relative to PO. The digestibility of palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), and linoleic (C18:2) were greater (P < 0.01) in RBO than PO, which positively influenced the energy values for RBO. These results indicate RBO has greater ME and digestibility of EE and FA, which positively influenced the growth performance of AA broilers. Therefore, RBO can be used to replace PO in broiler diets.
本研究旨在比较在生长型 ArborAcre(AA)肉鸡日粮中添加米糠油(RBO)和棕榈油(PO)时的能量和脂肪酸(FA)消化率。评估了玉米-豆粕基础日粮和添加 8% RBO 或 PO 的基础日粮。共选用 72 只 22 日龄、初始体重为 1173±6g 的 AA 雄性肉鸡,随机分为 3 个日粮处理组,每组 6 个重复,每个重复 4 只肉鸡。通过肉鸡 22-28 日龄的平衡试验比较了油脂的生长性能、AME 和 FA 消化率。RBO 日粮的 ME 大于(P<0.05)PO 日粮和基础日粮,而 PO 日粮的 ME 大于(P<0.05)基础日粮。然而,基础、RBO 和 PO 日粮肉鸡的 ME 摄入量无统计学差异。为了维持每日 ME 摄入量,相对于其他日粮,肉鸡采食更多的基础日粮,导致 CP 摄入量(P<0.01)和保留量(P<0.01)增加,高于添加 RBO 和 PO 的日粮。这导致基础日粮组肉鸡从 22-28 日龄的 BWG 和 ADG 显著(P<0.01)高于其他日粮组,但油源间的 BWG 和 ADG 无差异。然而,与 PO 相比,采食 RBO 的肉鸡的 BWD 和 ADG 有增加的趋势,但数值上更大,这可能是因为 RBO 提供了更高的 AME、AMEn、AME/GE、AMEn/GE(P<0.01)和乙醚提取物(EE)消化率(P=0.0536),而 PO 则相反。与 PO 相比,RBO 中棕榈酸(C16:0)、硬脂酸(C18:0)、油酸(C18:1)和亚油酸(C18:2)的消化率更高(P<0.01),这对 RBO 的能量值有积极影响。这些结果表明,RBO 具有更高的 ME 和 EE 及 FA 的消化率,这对 AA 肉鸡的生长性能有积极影响。因此,RBO 可用于替代肉鸡日粮中的 PO。