Department of Surgery, Kensei Hospital, 2 Ogimachi, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8511, Japan.
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01676-y.
Early cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, emergency surgery may not be indicated due to complications and disease severity. Patients requiring drainage are usually treated with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), whereas patients with biliary duct stones undergo endoscopic stones removal followed by endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EGBD). Herein, we investigated the efficacy of EGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis.
Overall, 101 patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2019 and September 2020 in our department were retrospectively analyzed.
The patients (n = 101) were divided into three groups: control group that did not undergo drainage (n = 68), a group that underwent EGBD (n = 7), and a group that underwent PTGBD (n = 26). Median surgery time was 107, 166, and 143 min, respectively. Control group had a significantly shorter surgery time, whereas it did not significantly differ between EGBD and PTGBD groups. The median amount of bleeding was 5 g, 7 g, and 7.5 g, respectively, and control group had significantly less bleeding than the drainage group. We further divided patients into the following subgroups: patients requiring a 5 mm clip to ligate the cystic duct, patients requiring a 10 mm clip due to the thickness of the cystic duct, patients requiring an automatic suturing device, and patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy due to impossible cystic duct ligation. There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD regarding the clip used or the need for an automatic suturing device and subtotal cholecystectomy.
There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD groups regarding surgery time or bleeding amount when surgery was performed after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Therefore, EGBD was considered a useful preoperative drainage method requiring no drainage bag.
急性胆囊炎患者推荐早期行胆囊切除术。然而,由于并发症和疾病严重程度,并非所有患者都适合急诊手术。需要引流的患者通常采用经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD),而有胆管结石的患者则采用内镜下取石术,随后行内镜下胆囊引流术(EGBD)。在此,我们研究了 EGBD 对急性胆囊炎患者的疗效。
回顾性分析 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 9 月我科接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 101 例患者。
患者(n=101)分为三组:未行引流的对照组(n=68)、行 EGBD 组(n=7)和行 PTGBD 组(n=26)。手术时间中位数分别为 107、166 和 143min,对照组手术时间明显缩短,EGBD 和 PTGBD 组间无显著差异。术中出血量中位数分别为 5、7 和 7.5g,对照组出血量明显少于引流组。我们进一步将患者分为以下亚组:需要用 5mm 夹结扎胆囊管的患者、需要用 10mm 夹结扎因胆囊管较厚的患者、需要使用自动缝合器的患者和因无法结扎胆囊管而行胆囊次全切除术的患者。EGBD 和 PTGBD 组在使用夹子或需要使用自动缝合器以及行胆囊次全切除术方面无显著差异。
急性胆囊炎行胆囊引流术后行胆囊切除术时,EGBD 和 PTGBD 组在手术时间或出血量方面无显著差异。因此,EGBD 被认为是一种有用的术前引流方法,无需引流袋。