Nishimura Erica, Takano Kiminori, Fujisaki Hiroto, Muroi Takako, Hayashi Keita, Tajima Yuki, Hongo Kumiko, Nakagawa Motohito
Department of Surgery, Hiratsuka City Hospital, 1-19-1 Minamihara, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, 254-0065, Japan.
Surg Today. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03076-0.
The optimal interval between gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the ideal interval to perform LC after drainage from the perspectives of surgical difficulty and patient satisfaction.
This retrospective study included patients who underwent LC after drainage at our institution between April 2016 and November 2023. The patients were divided into early surgery (ES) and delayed surgery (DS) groups. The surgical outcomes and surgical difficulty scores were compared between the groups.
A total of 72 patients (30 in the ES group and 42 in the DS group) were included. The median interval periods were 8 and 56 days in the ES and DS groups, respectively. Operative time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparable between the groups. However, the rates of achieving a critical view of safety and avoiding conversion to open surgery were significantly higher in the ES group than in the DS group. Finally, scarring around Calot's triangle was significantly greater in the DS group than in the ES group. In addition, 19% of the patients in the DS group experienced cholecystitis recurrence, and 40% had tube-related complications during the interval period.
The results showed that interval LC should be performed relatively soon after drainage.
急性胆囊炎胆囊引流与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)之间的最佳间隔时间仍不明确。本研究从手术难度和患者满意度的角度评估了引流后进行LC的理想间隔时间。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2016年4月至2023年11月期间在本机构接受引流后行LC的患者。患者被分为早期手术(ES)组和延迟手术(DS)组。比较两组的手术结果和手术难度评分。
共纳入72例患者(ES组30例,DS组42例)。ES组和DS组的中位间隔时间分别为8天和56天。两组的手术时间、失血量和术后并发症发生率相当。然而,ES组获得安全关键视野和避免转为开放手术的比率显著高于DS组。最后,DS组胆囊三角周围的瘢痕形成明显大于ES组。此外,DS组19%的患者在间隔期出现胆囊炎复发,40%有与引流管相关的并发症。
结果表明,间隔期LC应在引流后相对较短时间内进行。