Suppr超能文献

拯救生命的呼吸支持的生理基础。

The physiological underpinnings of life-saving respiratory support.

机构信息

Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;48(10):1274-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06749-3. Epub 2022 Jun 12.

Abstract

Treatment of respiratory failure has improved dramatically since the polio epidemic in the 1950s with the use of invasive techniques for respiratory support: mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal respiratory support. However, respiratory support is only a supportive therapy, designed to "buy time" while the disease causing respiratory failure abates. It ensures viable gas exchange and prevents cardiorespiratory collapse in the context of excessive loads. Because the use of invasive modalities of respiratory support is also associated with substantial harm, it remains the responsibility of the clinician to minimize such hazards. Direct iatrogenic consequences of mechanical ventilation include the risk to the lung (ventilator-induced lung injury) and the diaphragm (ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction and other forms of myotrauma). Adverse consequences on hemodynamics can also be significant. Indirect consequences (e.g., immobilization, sleep disruption) can have devastating long-term effects. Increasing awareness and understanding of these mechanisms of injury has led to a change in the philosophy of care with a shift from aiming to normalize gases toward minimizing harm. Lung (and more recently also diaphragm) protective ventilation strategies include the use of extracorporeal respiratory support when the risk of ventilation becomes excessive. This review provides an overview of the historical background of respiratory support, pathophysiology of respiratory failure and rationale for respiratory support, iatrogenic consequences from mechanical ventilation, specifics of the implementation of mechanical ventilation, and role of extracorporeal respiratory support. It highlights the need for appropriate monitoring to estimate risks and to individualize ventilation and sedation to provide safe respiratory support to each patient.

摘要

自 20 世纪 50 年代脊髓灰质炎流行以来,治疗呼吸衰竭的方法已有了显著改善,采用了有创技术进行呼吸支持:机械通气和体外呼吸支持。然而,呼吸支持只是一种支持性治疗,旨在“争取时间”,同时使引起呼吸衰竭的疾病得到缓解。它确保了可行的气体交换,并在过度负荷的情况下防止心肺崩溃。由于使用有创呼吸支持模式也会带来实质性的危害,因此,尽量减少这些危害仍然是临床医生的责任。机械通气的直接医源性后果包括对肺(呼吸机引起的肺损伤)和膈肌(呼吸机引起的膈肌功能障碍和其他形式的肌肉创伤)的风险。对血液动力学的不良后果也可能是显著的。间接后果(例如,固定、睡眠中断)可能会产生毁灭性的长期影响。对这些损伤机制的认识不断提高,导致了治疗理念的改变,从以气体正常化为目标转向以尽量减少危害为目标。肺(最近也包括膈肌)保护通气策略包括在通气风险过高时使用体外呼吸支持。这篇综述概述了呼吸支持的历史背景、呼吸衰竭的病理生理学和呼吸支持的基本原理、机械通气的医源性后果、机械通气的具体实施以及体外呼吸支持的作用。它强调了需要进行适当的监测,以评估风险,并根据每个患者的情况调整通气和镇静,以提供安全的呼吸支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7557/9188674/983f2fda2618/134_2022_6749_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验