• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大公共图书馆的市民工作坊以传播和讨论初级保健研究成果:准实验研究

Scaling Up Citizen Workshops in Public Libraries to Disseminate and Discuss Primary Care Research Results: Quasi-Experimental Study.

作者信息

Massougbodji José, Zomahoun Hervé Tchala Vignon, Adisso Evehouenou Lionel, Sawadogo Jasmine, Borde Valérie, Cameron Cynthia, Moisan Hélène, Paquette Jean-Sébastien, Akbaraly Zamzam, Châteauneuf Lëa-Kim, David Geneviève, Légaré France

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.

First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 19;5(3):e39016. doi: 10.2196/39016.

DOI:10.2196/39016
PMID:35690963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9440407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about engaging patients and stakeholders in the process of scaling up effective knowledge translation interventions targeting the public.

OBJECTIVE

Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, we aimed to scale up and evaluate an effective pilot program to disseminate research results in public libraries.

METHODS

We conducted a scaling-up study targeting the public. On the basis of our successful pilot project, we codeveloped and implemented a large-scale program of free citizen workshops in public libraries, in a close research partnership with stakeholders and patient representatives. Citizen workshops, each facilitated by 1 participating physician and 1 science communicator, consisted of a 45-minute computer-assisted presentation and a 45-minute open exchange. The intervention outcome was knowledge gained. The scale-up outcomes were satisfaction, appropriateness, coverage, and costs. An evaluation questionnaire was used to collect data of interest. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The workshop theme chosen by the patient and stakeholder representatives was the high prevalence of medication overuse among people aged ≥65 years. From April to May 2019, 26 workshops were conducted in 25 public libraries reaching 362 people. The mean age of participants was 64.8 (SD 12.5) years. In total, 18 participating physicians and 6 science communicators facilitated the workshops. Participants reported significant knowledge gain (mean difference 2.1, 95% CI 2.0-2.2; P<.001). The median score for overall public satisfaction was 9 out of 10 (IQR 8-10). The public participants globally rated the workshops as having a high level of appropriateness. Coverage was 92% (25/27) of the total number of public libraries targeted. Costs were CAD $6051.84 (US $4519.69) for workshop design and CAD $22,935.41 (US $17,128.85) for scaling them up.

CONCLUSIONS

This project successfully established a large-scale and successful implementation science or knowledge translation bridge among researchers, clinicians, and citizens via public libraries. This study provides a model for a dissemination practice that benefits the public by both engaging them in the dissemination process and targeting them directly.

摘要

背景

在扩大针对公众的有效知识转化干预措施的过程中,关于让患者和利益相关者参与其中的情况鲜为人知。

目的

采用综合知识转化方法,我们旨在扩大并评估一项在公共图书馆传播研究成果的有效试点项目。

方法

我们开展了一项针对公众的扩大规模研究。基于我们成功的试点项目,我们与利益相关者和患者代表密切合作,共同开发并实施了一项在公共图书馆举办免费公民工作坊的大规模项目。每个公民工作坊由1名参与的医生和1名科学传播者主持,包括45分钟的计算机辅助演示和45分钟的开放式交流。干预结果是获得的知识。扩大规模的结果是满意度、适宜性、覆盖范围和成本。使用一份评估问卷来收集相关数据。进行了定量和定性分析。

结果

患者和利益相关者代表选择的工作坊主题是65岁及以上人群中药物过度使用的高患病率。2019年4月至5月,在25家公共图书馆举办了26场工作坊,共有362人参加。参与者的平均年龄为64.8(标准差12.5)岁。共有18名参与的医生和6名科学传播者主持了这些工作坊。参与者报告知识有显著增加(平均差异2.1,95%置信区间2.0 - 2.2;P <.001)。总体公众满意度的中位数评分是十分制中的9分(四分位距8 - 10)。公众参与者总体上认为这些工作坊具有很高的适宜性。覆盖范围为目标公共图书馆总数的92%(25/27)。工作坊设计成本为6051.84加元(4519.69美元),扩大规模的成本为22935.41加元(17128.85美元)。

结论

该项目通过公共图书馆成功地在研究人员、临床医生和公民之间建立了一个大规模且成功的实施科学或知识转化桥梁。本研究提供了一种传播实践模式,通过让公众参与传播过程并直接针对他们,从而使公众受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49be/9440407/fe9496e5b4c0/aging_v5i3e39016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49be/9440407/05bb7563e844/aging_v5i3e39016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49be/9440407/fe9496e5b4c0/aging_v5i3e39016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49be/9440407/05bb7563e844/aging_v5i3e39016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49be/9440407/fe9496e5b4c0/aging_v5i3e39016_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Scaling Up Citizen Workshops in Public Libraries to Disseminate and Discuss Primary Care Research Results: Quasi-Experimental Study.扩大公共图书馆的市民工作坊以传播和讨论初级保健研究成果:准实验研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 19;5(3):e39016. doi: 10.2196/39016.
2
Knowledge exchange sessions on primary health care research findings in public libraries: A qualitative study with citizens in Quebec.在公共图书馆开展初级卫生保健研究成果知识交流活动:魁北克公民参与的一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289153. eCollection 2023.
3
Citizen science at public libraries: Data on librarians and users perceptions of participating in a citizen science project in Catalunya, Spain.公共图书馆中的公民科学:关于西班牙加泰罗尼亚图书馆员和用户参与公民科学项目的认知数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Dec 13;40:107713. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107713. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
5
Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey.参与健康和社会服务扩大计划的患者和公众的策略:范围综述和德尔菲调查的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6.
6
Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness.患者能否接受培训以期待在临床咨询中进行共同决策?提高患者意识的公共图书馆计划的可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208449. eCollection 2018.
7
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
8
Implementation of a Work-Related Asthma Screening Questionnaire in Clinical Settings: Multimethods Study.在临床环境中实施与工作相关的哮喘筛查问卷:多方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 15;6(9):e37503. doi: 10.2196/37503.
9
Identifying project topics and requirements in a citizen science project in rare diseases: a participative study.在罕见病公民科学项目中确定项目主题和需求:一项参与式研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Sep 14;17(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02514-3.
10
Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions.与患者和医疗专业人员开展数字参与式研讨会以制定多药治疗管理干预措施:混合方法评估结果及方法学结论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 16;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00387-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Process for Rapid Co-development of a Decision Aid Prototype for Population-wide Cancer Screening.针对全人群癌症筛查的决策辅助工具原型快速共同开发流程
Med Decis Making. 2025 Oct;45(7):775-793. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251346894. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Spontaneous Scaling of a Primary Care Innovation in Real-Life Conditions: Protocol for a Case Study.现实生活条件下基层医疗创新的自发推广:一项案例研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Dec 28;12:e54855. doi: 10.2196/54855.
3
Knowledge exchange sessions on primary health care research findings in public libraries: A qualitative study with citizens in Quebec.

本文引用的文献

1
Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process.健康干预措施定标研究报告的基本要素(SUCCEED):系统评价和德尔菲法的议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 11;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1258-3.
2
Reconciling Adaptation and Fidelity: Implications for Scaling Up High Quality Youth Programs.协调适应性与保真度:对扩大高质量青年项目规模的启示
J Prim Prev. 2019 Feb;40(1):35-49. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00535-6.
3
Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness.
在公共图书馆开展初级卫生保健研究成果知识交流活动:魁北克公民参与的一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289153. eCollection 2023.
患者能否接受培训以期待在临床咨询中进行共同决策?提高患者意识的公共图书馆计划的可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208449. eCollection 2018.
4
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
5
Revisiting the utility of retrospective pre-post designs: The need for mixed-method pilot data.重新审视回顾性前后设计的效用:对混合方法试点数据的需求。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Public Libraries: A Community-Level Resource to Advance Population Health.公共图书馆:提升人口健康水平的社区资源。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):192-199. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0547-4.
7
Strengthening scaling up through learning from implementation: comparing experiences from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Uganda.强化从实施中学习以扩大规模:比较阿富汗、孟加拉国和乌干达的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):108. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0270-0.
8
Effective strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in primary care: a systematic review.在基层医疗中推广基于证据的实践的有效策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 22;12(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0672-y.
9
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement.报告实施研究的标准(StaRI)声明。
BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795.
10
Beyond Books: Public Libraries As Partners For Population Health.超越书籍:公共图书馆作为促进全民健康的合作伙伴
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):2030-2036. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0724.