VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6.
The scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS.
We will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants-any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention-any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator-no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting-HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities.
Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS.
We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 ( https://osf.io/zqpx7/ ).
为了减少卫生和社会服务(HSS)中的浪费和不平等现象,需要扩大循证创新。然而,这往往是一个由政策制定者发起的自上而下的过程,而忘记了预期受益人的价值观。因此,让包括患者和公众在内的多个利益相关者参与扩大规模的过程至关重要,但也非常复杂。我们建议确定有意义和公平地让患者和公众参与 HSS 扩大规模的科学和实践的相关策略。
我们将从 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法中调整我们的整体方法。在此基础上,我们将进行一项两部分的研究设计(知识综合和 Delphi 研究),以综合知识转化方法为基础。这种方法涉及对参与扩大患者和公众参与(PPI)以及多学科指导委员会的利益相关者网络的广泛参与。我们将按照 Joanna Briggs 研究所审查员手册中推荐的方法进行系统范围审查。我们将使用以下纳入标准:(1)参与者-参与制定或测试 PPI 策略的任何利益相关者;(2)干预措施-为扩大举措提出的任何 PPI 策略;(3)比较器-无限制;(4)结果:与 PPI 相关的任何过程或结果指标;(5)设置-HSS。我们将从一开始就搜索电子数据库(例如,Medline,Web of Science,社会学摘要),手动搜索相关网站,筛选纳入记录的参考文献,并咨询该领域的专家。两名审查员将独立选择和提取合格的研究。我们将使用 PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查(PRISMA-ScR)清单对数据进行定量和定性总结,并报告结果。我们将进行在线 Delphi 调查,以就 HSS 中扩大举措中 PPI 的相关策略达成共识。参与者将包括来自低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的利益相关者。我们预计三轮将允许对研究重点达成可接受的共识程度。
我们的研究结果将增进对如何在扩大可持续 HSS 的举措中让患者和公众有意义和公平地参与的理解。
我们于 2020 年 8 月 19 日在开放科学框架上注册了本方案(https://osf.io/zqpx7/)。