Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Santiago University Campus, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal; Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;303(Pt 3):135197. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135197. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
In spite of the sensitivity of amphibians to contamination, data from fish have been commonly used to predict the effects of chemicals on aquatic life stages. However, recent studies have highlighted that toxicity data derived from fish species may not protect all the aquatic life stages of amphibians. For pesticide toxicity assessment (PTA), EFSA has highlighted that more information on lethal toxicity for the aquatic life stages of amphibians is still needed to reduce uncertainties. The current review aims to propose a test with amphibians based on spatial avoidance, as a more humane alternative method to the lethality tests for chemicals. A review of lethal toxicity tests carried out with amphibians in the period between 2018 and 2021 is presented, then we discuss the suitability of using fish toxicity data as a surrogate to predict the effects on more sensitive amphibian groups. The possible differences in sensitivity to chemicals may justify the need to develop further tests with amphibian embryos and larvae in order to reduce uncertainties. A new test is proposed focused on the avoidance behaviour of organisms fleeing from contamination to replace lethal tests. As avoidance indicates the threshold at which organisms will flee from contamination, a reduction in the population density, or its disappearance, at the local scale due to emigration is expected, with ecological consequences analogous to mortality. Avoidance tests provide an ethical advantage over lethal tests as they respect the concepts of the 3 Rs (mainly Refinement), reducing the suffering of the organisms.
尽管两栖动物对污染很敏感,但鱼类的数据通常被用于预测化学物质对水生生命阶段的影响。然而,最近的研究强调,从鱼类物种中获得的毒性数据可能无法保护所有两栖动物的水生生命阶段。对于农药毒性评估(PTA),EFSA 强调,仍然需要更多关于两栖动物水生生命阶段的致死毒性信息,以减少不确定性。本综述旨在提出一种基于空间回避的两栖动物测试方法,作为替代化学物质致死性测试的更人道的替代方法。对 2018 年至 2021 年期间用两栖动物进行的致死毒性测试进行了综述,然后讨论了使用鱼类毒性数据作为替代物预测对更敏感的两栖动物群体的影响的适宜性。对化学物质的敏感性可能存在差异,这可能证明有必要进一步用两栖动物胚胎和幼虫进行测试,以减少不确定性。提出了一种新的测试方法,重点研究生物逃离污染的回避行为,以替代致死性测试。由于回避行为表明了生物将逃离污染的阈值,预计在局部范围内,由于迁徙,种群密度会降低,或者消失,从而产生类似死亡的生态后果。回避测试相对于致死测试具有伦理优势,因为它们尊重 3R 原则(主要是改进),减少了生物的痛苦。