• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下腔静脉直径比值与胃肠道出血患者预后的相关性

Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio with outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Jo Namwoo, Oh Jaehoon, Kang Hyunggoo, Lim Tae Ho, Ko Byuk Sung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;9(2):101-107. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.099. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.21.099
PMID:35692092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288874/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter ratio measured using computed tomography with outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on consecutive patients with GIB who presented to the emergency department. The IVC diameter ratio was calculated by dividing the maximum transverse and anteroposterior diameters perpendicular to it. The association of the IVC diameter ratio with outcomes was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of the IVC diameter ratio was calculated, and the sensitivity and specificity, including the cutoff values, were computed.

RESULTS

In total, 585 patients were included in the final analysis. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6% (n=27). The IVC diameter ratio was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality in multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 1.793; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.239-2.597; P=0.002). The AUC of the IVC diameter ratio for in-hospital mortality was 0.616 (95% CI, 0.498-0.735). With a cutoff of the IVC diameter ratio (≥2.1), the sensitivity and specificity for predicting in-hospital mortality were 44% (95% CI, 26%-65%) and 71% (95% CI, 67%-75%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IVC diameter ratio was independently associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with GIB. However, the AUC of the IVC diameter ratio for in-hospital mortality was low.

摘要

目的

探讨利用计算机断层扫描测量的下腔静脉(IVC)直径比值与胃肠道出血(GIB)患者预后的相关性。

方法

对连续就诊于急诊科的GIB患者进行单中心回顾性观察研究。IVC直径比值通过将最大横径与垂直于它的前后径相除来计算。采用多变量逻辑回归分析检验IVC直径比值与预后的相关性。主要结局是住院死亡率。计算IVC直径比值的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积,并计算敏感性和特异性,包括临界值。

结果

最终分析共纳入585例患者。住院死亡率为4.6%(n = 27)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,IVC直径比值与较高的住院死亡率显著相关(比值比,1.793;95%置信区间[CI],1.239 - 2.597;P = 0.002)。IVC直径比值预测住院死亡率的AUC为0.616(95% CI,0.498 - 0.735)。IVC直径比值临界值(≥2.1)时,预测住院死亡率的敏感性和特异性分别为44%(95% CI,26% - 65%)和71%(95% CI,67% - 75%)。

结论

IVC直径比值与GIB患者的住院死亡率独立相关。然而,IVC直径比值预测住院死亡率的AUC较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/5f7da977bfed/ceem-21-099f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/297535da1ad9/ceem-21-099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/05d1c9f996f7/ceem-21-099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/5f7da977bfed/ceem-21-099f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/297535da1ad9/ceem-21-099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/05d1c9f996f7/ceem-21-099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d3/9288874/5f7da977bfed/ceem-21-099f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio with outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.下腔静脉直径比值与胃肠道出血患者预后的相关性
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;9(2):101-107. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.099. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
2
Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio measured on computed tomography scans with the outcome of patients with septic shock.计算机断层扫描测量的下腔静脉直径比值与感染性休克患者预后的相关性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22880. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022880.
3
Initial inferior vena cava diameter predicts massive transfusion requirements in blunt trauma patients: A retrospective cohort study.初始下腔静脉直径预测钝性创伤患者大量输血需求:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1155-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.049. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
Initial inferior vena cava diameter on computed tomographic scan independently predicts mortality in severely injured trauma patients.计算机断层扫描检查初始下腔静脉直径可独立预测严重创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):741-5; discussion 745-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182827270.
5
Cardiovascular CT in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction: predictive value of inferior vena cava cross-sectional area.心血管CT在诊断心包缩窄中的应用:下腔静脉横截面积的预测价值
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr;8(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
6
Decreased inferior vena cava diameter as an early marker in postpartum hemorrhage.下腔静脉直径减小作为产后出血的早期标志物。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):234-240. doi: 10.1002/uog.23695. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
Comparison of IVC diameter ratio, BUN/creatinine ratio and BUN/albumin ratio for risk prediction in emergency department patients.比较 IVC 直径比、BUN/肌酐比和 BUN/白蛋白比在急诊科患者风险预测中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.081. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Prognostic capacity of inferior vena cava diameter for severe postpartum hemorrhage.下腔静脉直径对严重产后出血的预后能力。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
9
A Flat Inferior Vena Cava on Computed Tomography Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery.计算机断层扫描显示下腔静脉平坦与急诊普通外科不良结局相关。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:274-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Maximum inferior vena cava diameter predicts post-induction hypotension in hypertensive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: A prospective cohort study.最大下腔静脉直径可预测全身麻醉下接受非心脏手术的高血压患者诱导后低血压:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 4;9:958259. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.958259. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio measured on computed tomography scans with the outcome of patients with septic shock.计算机断层扫描测量的下腔静脉直径比值与感染性休克患者预后的相关性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22880. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022880.
2
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理:国际共识组的指南推荐。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
AIMS65 评分系统在预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床结局方面可与 Glasgow-Blatchford 评分或 Rockall 评分相媲美。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8.
4
Early Risk Score for Predicting Hypotension in Normotensive Patients with Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleedin.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的血压正常患者发生低血压的早期风险评分
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 2;8(1):37. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010037.
5
CT for Evaluation of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding.CT 用于急性胃肠道出血的评估。
Radiographics. 2018 Jul-Aug;38(4):1089-1107. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170138. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Changing Epidemiology of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in the Last Decade: A Nationwide Analysis.过去十年中上消化道出血的流行病学变化:一项全国性分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1286-1293. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4882-6. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: what the radiologist needs to know.急性胃肠道出血的CT血管造影:放射科医生需要了解的内容。
Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20170076. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170076. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较:国际多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.
9
Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分、内镜检查前罗卡尔评分和AIMS65评分在预测静脉曲张出血的再出血率和死亡率方面没有差异。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1200138. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.急性上消化道出血的风险分层:AIMS65 评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德和罗克洛评分系统的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.