Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Medical, Biomolecular Pathology and Intensive Care Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Transpl Int. 2022 May 27;35:10405. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10405. eCollection 2022.
Based on published data, we have carried out a hospital-based health technology assessment of machine perfusion in adult liver transplantation using cold storage as a comparator, and within the perspective of a national health system-based hospital practice and disease-related group reimbursement policy. A systematic literature review on machine perfusion for adult liver transplantation was conducted exploring the Pubmed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The literature was analyzed with the intent to provide information on 6 dimensions and 19 items of the hospital-based health technology assessment framework derived from previous studies. Out of 705 references, 47 (6.7%) were retained for current analysis. Use of machine perfusion was associated with advantages over cold storage, i.e., a 10%-50% reduced risk for early allograft dysfunction, 7%-15% less ischemia reperfusion injury; 7%-50% fewer ischemic biliary complications, comparable or improved 1-year graft and patient survival, and up to a 50% lower graft discard rate. Hospital stay was not longer, and technical failures were anecdotal. Information on costs of machine perfusion is limited, but this technology is projected to increase hospital costs while cost-effectiveness analysis requires data over the transplant patient lifetime. No hospital-based health technology assessment study on machine perfusion in liver transplantation was previously conducted. From the hospital perspective, there is evidence of the clinical advantages of this novel technology, but strategies to counterbalance the increased costs of liver transplantation are urgently needed. Further studies should focus on the ethical, social, and organizational issues related to machine perfusion.
基于已发表的数据,我们进行了一项基于医院的健康技术评估,比较了机器灌注和冷藏在成人肝移植中的应用,评估视角为基于国家卫生系统的医院实践和疾病相关分组报销政策。我们进行了一项关于机器灌注在成人肝移植中应用的系统文献回顾,检索了 Pubmed、CINAHL、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库。对文献进行了分析,旨在提供 6 个维度和 19 个项目的医院健康技术评估框架信息,这些信息来源于先前的研究。在 705 篇参考文献中,有 47 篇(6.7%)被保留用于当前分析。与冷藏相比,使用机器灌注有以下优势,即早期移植物功能障碍的风险降低 10%-50%,缺血再灌注损伤减少 7%-15%;缺血性胆系并发症减少 7%-50%,1 年移植物和患者存活率相当或提高,移植物废弃率降低 50%。住院时间没有延长,技术失败也只是偶发事件。关于机器灌注成本的信息有限,但这项技术预计会增加医院的成本,而成本效益分析需要在移植患者的整个生命周期内获得数据。以前没有关于机器灌注在肝移植中的医院健康技术评估研究。从医院的角度来看,有证据表明这种新技术具有临床优势,但急需制定策略来平衡肝移植成本的增加。进一步的研究应集中在与机器灌注相关的伦理、社会和组织问题上。