Xu Xin-Yi, Jiang Xiao-Man, Xu Qin, Xu Hao, Luo Jin-Hua, Yao Cui, Ding Ling-Yu, Zhu Shu-Qin
Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 27;12:892935. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892935. eCollection 2022.
Gastrointestinal cancers are the most common malignant tumors worldwide. As the improvement of survival by surgical resection alone for cancers is close to the bottleneck, recent neoadjuvant therapy has been emphasized and applied in the treatment. Despite the advantage on improving the prognosis, some studies have reported neoadjuvant therapy could reduce skeletal muscle and therefore affect postoperative outcomes. However, the conclusions are still controversial.
PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 2, 2021. The inclusion criteria were observational studies, published in English, of individuals aged ≥18 years who underwent neoadjuvant therapy with gastrointestinal cancers and were assessed skeletal muscle mass before and after neoadjuvant therapy, with sufficient data on skeletal muscle change or the association with clinical outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted by using the STATA 12.0 package when more than two studies reported the same outcome.
A total of 268 articles were identified, and 19 studies (1,954 patients) were included in the review. The fixed effects model showed that the risk of sarcopenia increased 22% after receiving neoadjuvant therapy (HR=1.22, 95% CI 1.14, 1.31, Z=4.286, P<0.001). In the random effects model, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with skeletal muscle loss, with a standardized mean difference of -0.20 (95% CI -0.31, -0.09, =3.49, P<0.001) and a significant heterogeneity ( 62.2%, <0.001). Multiple meta regression indicated that population, neoadjuvant therapy type, and measuring tool were the potential sources of heterogeneity. The funnel plot revealed that there was no high publication bias in these studies (Begg's test, P=0.544) and the sensitivity analysis showed stable results when separately excluding studies. For the postoperative outcomes, the results revealed that muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy was significantly related to overall survival (HR=2,08, 95% CI =1.47, 2.95, =4.12, P<0.001, 0.0%), but not related to disease-free survival and other short-term outcomes.
This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that skeletal muscle decreased significantly during neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and skeletal muscle loss was strongly associated with worse overall survival. More high-quality studies are needed to update and valid these conclusions in a more specific or stratified way.
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021292118).
胃肠道癌是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤。由于单纯手术切除癌症患者的生存率提升已接近瓶颈,近年来新辅助治疗受到重视并应用于临床。尽管新辅助治疗在改善预后方面具有优势,但一些研究报告称其会导致骨骼肌减少,进而影响术后结局。然而,这些结论仍存在争议。
检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索时间范围为建库至2021年9月2日。纳入标准为以英文发表的观察性研究,研究对象为年龄≥18岁、接受胃肠道癌新辅助治疗且在新辅助治疗前后评估了骨骼肌质量、有足够骨骼肌变化数据或与临床结局关联数据的个体。当有两项以上研究报告相同结局时,使用STATA 12.0软件包进行荟萃分析。
共识别出268篇文章,19项研究(1954例患者)纳入本综述。固定效应模型显示,接受新辅助治疗后肌肉减少症风险增加22%(HR=1.22,95%CI 1.14,1.31,Z=4.286,P<0.001)。随机效应模型中,新辅助治疗与骨骼肌减少相关,标准化均差为-0.20(95%CI -0.31,-0.09,I²=62.2%,P<0.001),存在显著异质性。多元Meta回归表明,研究人群、新辅助治疗类型和测量工具是异质性的潜在来源。漏斗图显示这些研究中不存在高发表偏倚(Begg检验,P=0.544),敏感性分析显示在单独排除研究时结果稳定。对于术后结局,结果显示新辅助治疗期间的肌肉减少与总生存期显著相关(HR=2.08,95%CI 1.47,2.95,Z=4.12,P<0.001,I²=0.0%),但与无病生存期和其他短期结局无关。
本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,胃肠道癌患者在新辅助治疗期间骨骼肌显著减少,且骨骼肌减少与较差的总生存期密切相关。需要更多高质量研究以更具体或分层的方式更新和验证这些结论。
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/],标识符PROSPERO(CRD42021292118)