Chow Ngai, Gallo Lucas, Busse Jason W
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, HSC-2C, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
The Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, MDCL-2101, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Precis Clin Med. 2018 Sep;1(2):60-64. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pby009. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Evidence-based medicine is widely promoted for decision-making in health care and is associated with improved patient outcomes. Critics have suggested that evidence-based medicine focuses primarily on groups of patients rather than individuals, but often fail to consider subgroup analyses, N-of-1 trials, and the incorporation of patient values and preferences. Precision medicine has been promoted as an approach to individualize diagnosis and treatment of diseases through genetic, biomarker, phenotypic, and psychosocial characteristics. However, there are often high costs associated with personalized medicine, and high-quality evidence is lacking for effectiveness in many applications. For the potential of personalized medicine to be realized, it must adhere to the principles of evidence-based medicine: (1) evidence in isolation is not sufficient to make clinical decisions-patient's values and preferences as well as resource implications must be considered, and (2) there is a hierarchy of evidence to guide clinical decision-making and studies at lower risk of bias are likely to provide more trustworthy findings.
循证医学在医疗保健决策中得到广泛推广,并与改善患者预后相关。批评者指出,循证医学主要关注患者群体而非个体,且常常未考虑亚组分析、单病例试验以及患者价值观和偏好的纳入。精准医学已被倡导为一种通过基因、生物标志物、表型和社会心理特征来实现疾病诊断和治疗个体化的方法。然而,个性化医疗往往成本高昂,且在许多应用中缺乏关于其有效性的高质量证据。为了实现个性化医疗的潜力,它必须遵循循证医学的原则:(1)孤立的证据不足以做出临床决策,必须考虑患者的价值观和偏好以及资源影响;(2)存在证据等级体系来指导临床决策,偏倚风险较低的研究可能会提供更可靠的结果。