Suppr超能文献

一种基于循证医学的糖尿病降糖治疗方法以避免过度治疗。

An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus to Overcome Overtreatment.

作者信息

Makam Anil N, Nguyen Oanh K

机构信息

From Division of General Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.N.M., O.K.N.); and Division of Outcomes & Health Services Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.N.M., O.K.N.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2017 Jan 10;135(2):180-195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022622.

Abstract

Overtreatment is pervasive in medicine and leads to potential patient harms and excessive costs in health care. Although evidence-based medicine is often derided as practice by rote algorithmic medicine, the appropriate application of key evidence-based medicine principles in clinical decision making is fundamental to preventing overtreatment and promoting high-value, individualized patient-centered care. Specifically, this article discusses the importance of (1) using absolute rather than relative estimates of benefits to inform treatment decisions; (2) considering the time horizon to benefit of treatments; (3) balancing potential harms and benefits; and (4) using shared decision making by physicians to incorporate the patient's values and preferences into treatment decisions. Here, we illustrate the application of these principles to considering the decision of whether or not to recommend intensive glycemic control to patients to minimize microvascular and cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Through this lens, this example will illustrate how an evidence-based medicine approach can be used to individualize glycemic goals and prevent overtreatment, and can serve as a template for applying evidence-based medicine to inform treatment decisions for other conditions to optimize health and individualize patient care.

摘要

过度治疗在医学领域普遍存在,会给患者带来潜在危害,并导致医疗保健成本过高。尽管循证医学常被诟病为机械的算法医学,但在临床决策中恰当应用关键的循证医学原则对于预防过度治疗和促进高价值、以患者为中心的个性化医疗至关重要。具体而言,本文讨论了以下几点的重要性:(1)使用绝对而非相对的获益估计来指导治疗决策;(2)考虑治疗获益的时间范围;(3)权衡潜在危害和获益;(4)医生采用共同决策将患者的价值观和偏好纳入治疗决策。在此,我们举例说明这些原则在考虑是否建议对2型糖尿病患者进行强化血糖控制以尽量减少微血管和心血管并发症决策中的应用。通过这个视角,这个例子将说明循证医学方法如何用于个性化血糖目标并预防过度治疗,并且可以作为应用循证医学为其他病症的治疗决策提供依据以优化健康状况和实现患者个性化医疗的模板。

相似文献

7
Shared Decision-Making in Diabetes Care.糖尿病护理中的共同决策
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Dec;15(12):112. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0688-0.
8
N of 1 trials in diabetes: making individual therapeutic decisions.糖尿病的单病例试验:做出个体化治疗决策
Diabetologia. 2008 Jun;51(6):921-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0983-2. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
10
How contextual issues can distort shared decision making.背景因素如何扭曲共同决策。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Dec;118-119:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.利拉鲁肽与2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验