Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定和丙泊酚对椎管内麻醉患者低温影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on hypothermia in patients under spinal anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2022 May 16;19(5):909-915. doi: 10.7150/ijms.72754. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Redistribution hypothermia caused by vasodilation during anesthesia is the primary cause of perioperative hypothermia. Propofol exerts a dose-dependent vasodilatory effect, whereas dexmedetomidine induces peripheral vasoconstriction at high plasma concentrations. This study compared the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on core temperature in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia. This prospective study included 40 patients (aged 19-70 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status class I-III who underwent elective orthopedic lower-limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to a dexmedetomidine or propofol group ( = 20 per group). After induction of spinal anesthesia, patients received dexmedetomidine (loading dose: 1 μg/kg over 10 min; maintenance dose: 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h) or propofol (loading dose: 75 μg/kg over 10 min; maintenance dose: 12.5-75 μg/kg/min). The doses of sedatives were titrated to maintain moderate sedation. During the perioperative period, tympanic temperatures, thermal comfort score, and shivering grade were recorded. Core temperature at the end of surgery did not differ significantly between the groups (36.4 ± 0.4 and 36.1 ± 0.7°C in the dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively; P = 0.118). The lowest perioperative temperature, incidence and severity of perioperative hypothermia, thermal comfort score, and shivering grade did not differ significantly between the groups (all P > 0.05). In patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with moderate sedation, the effect of dexmedetomidine on patients' core temperature was similar to that of propofol.

摘要

麻醉期间血管扩张引起的体温重新分布是围手术期低体温的主要原因。丙泊酚发挥剂量依赖性血管扩张作用,而右美托咪定在高血浆浓度时引起外周血管收缩。本研究比较了右美托咪定和丙泊酚对椎管内麻醉下手术患者核心体温的影响。

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 40 例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I-III 级的择期骨科下肢手术患者,在椎管内麻醉下接受手术。患者被随机分配到右美托咪定或丙泊酚组(每组 20 例)。在诱导椎管内麻醉后,患者接受右美托咪定(负荷剂量:1μg/kg 持续 10 分钟;维持剂量:0.2-0.7μg/kg/h)或丙泊酚(负荷剂量:75μg/kg 持续 10 分钟;维持剂量:12.5-75μg/kg/min)。镇静剂的剂量被滴定以维持中度镇静。在围手术期,记录鼓膜温度、热舒适度评分和寒战分级。手术结束时两组核心温度无显著差异(右美托咪定组和丙泊酚组分别为 36.4±0.4°C 和 36.1±0.7°C;P=0.118)。围手术期最低体温、围手术期低体温的发生率和严重程度、热舒适度评分和寒战分级在两组间无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。

在接受中度镇静的椎管内麻醉患者中,右美托咪定对患者核心体温的影响与丙泊酚相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验