Department Viroscience, Erasmus MCgrid.5645.2, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
mBio. 2022 Jun 28;13(3):e0124922. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01249-22. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to evolve in response to selective pressures poses a challenge to vaccine and antiviral efficacy. The S1 subunit of the spike (S) protein contains the receptor-binding domain and is therefore under selective pressure to evade neutralizing antibodies elicited by vaccination or infection. In contrast, the S2 subunit of S is only transiently exposed after receptor binding, which makes it a less efficient target for antibodies. As a result, S2 has a lower mutational frequency than S1. We recently described monomeric and dimeric SARS-CoV-2 fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides that block viral infection by interfering with S2 conformational rearrangements during viral entry. Importantly, a dimeric lipopeptide was shown to block SARS-CoV-2 transmission between ferrets Because the S2 subunit is relatively conserved in newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), we hypothesize that fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides are cross-protective against infection with VOCs. Here, we directly compared the efficacies of two fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides against VOC, in comparison with a set of seven postvaccination sera (two doses) and a commercial monoclonal antibody preparation. For the beta, delta, and omicron VOCs, it has been reported that convalescent and postvaccination sera are less potent in virus neutralization assays. Both fusion-inhibitory lipopeptides were equally effective against all five VOCs compared to ancestral virus, whereas postvaccination sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibody lost potency to newer VOCs, in particular to omicron BA.1 and BA.2. The neutralizing activity of the lipopeptides is consistent, and they can be expected to neutralize future VOCs based on their mechanism of action. SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, continues to spread globally, with waves resulting from new variants that evade immunity generated by vaccines and previous strains and escape available monoclonal antibody therapy. Fusion-inhibitory peptides may provide an intervention strategy that is not similarly affected by this viral evolution.
SARS-CoV-2 能够针对选择压力进化,这给疫苗和抗病毒药物的疗效带来了挑战。刺突(S)蛋白的 S1 亚基包含受体结合域,因此受到选择性压力的影响,以逃避疫苗接种或感染引起的中和抗体。相比之下,S 的 S2 亚基仅在受体结合后短暂暴露,这使其成为抗体的效率较低的靶标。因此,S2 的突变频率低于 S1。我们最近描述了单体和二聚体 SARS-CoV-2 融合抑制脂肽,这些脂肽通过干扰病毒进入过程中 S2 构象重排来阻断病毒感染。重要的是,二聚体脂肽已被证明可以阻止雪貂之间的 SARS-CoV-2 传播。由于 S2 亚基在新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 关注变体(VOC)中相对保守,我们假设融合抑制脂肽对感染 VOC 具有交叉保护作用。在这里,我们直接比较了两种融合抑制脂肽对 VOC 的功效,与一组七份接种后血清(两剂)和一种商业单克隆抗体制剂进行了比较。对于β、德尔塔和奥密克戎 VOC,据报道,恢复期和接种后血清在病毒中和测定中效力较低。与原始病毒相比,两种融合抑制脂肽对所有五种 VOC 均同样有效,而接种后血清和治疗性单克隆抗体对新型 VOC 的效力降低,特别是对奥密克戎 BA.1 和 BA.2。脂肽的中和活性是一致的,根据其作用机制,它们有望中和未来的 VOC。
SARS-CoV-2 是 COVID-19 的病原体,继续在全球范围内传播,新变体的出现导致了一波又一波的疫情,这些变体逃避了疫苗和以前菌株产生的免疫,并逃避了现有的单克隆抗体治疗。融合抑制肽可能提供一种干预策略,不会受到这种病毒进化的类似影响。