El Hage Chehade Nabil, Ghoneim Sara, Shah Sagar, Chahine Anastasia, Issak Abdulfatah, Choi Alyssa Y, Moosvi Zain, Chang Kenneth J, Samarasena Jason B
Department of Internal Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):957-968. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07518-4. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
The utility of combination rectal NSAID and topical epinephrine (EI) or rectal NSAID and normal saline (SI) sprayed on duodenal papilla in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) has been studied but results have been conflicting.
To evaluate the benefit of using combination prophylaxis in preventing PEP.
A literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases in May 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults patients who underwent ERCP and received EI versus SI were eligible for inclusion. The pooled effect was expressed as odds ratio (OR) to assess the rate of PEP, severity of PEP, and specific adverse events. The results were pooled using Reviewer Manager 5.4 software.
Six RCTs involving 4016 patients were included in the final analysis. The EI group did not demonstrate any significant benefit over SI group in preventing PEP (OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.45], P = 0.98), irrespective of gender or the epinephrine concentration used. The tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant with P-values of 0.66 and 0.28, respectively. The addition of topical epinephrine to rectal NSAID did not improve the rate of moderate to severe PEP (OR = 0.94, P = 0.86) or PEP in high-risk patients (OR = 1.14, 95%, P = 0.73). The rates of infection, including cholangitis and sepsis (OR = 0.63, P = 0.07), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 1.25, P = 0.56) and procedure-related death (OR = 0.71, P = 0.59) were similar between both groups.
The addition of topical epinephrine did not demonstrate any benefit over rectal NSAID alone in preventing PEP or reducing other procedure-related adverse events.
已对直肠非甾体抗炎药与局部用肾上腺素(EI)联合使用或直肠非甾体抗炎药与喷于十二指肠乳头的生理盐水(SI)联合使用在预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎(PEP)中的效用进行了研究,但结果存在矛盾。
评估联合预防措施在预防PEP中的益处。
于2021年5月使用Scopus、PubMed/MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库进行文献检索。纳入接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术并接受EI对比SI的成年患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。汇总效应以比值比(OR)表示,以评估PEP发生率、PEP严重程度和特定不良事件。使用Reviewer Manager 5.4软件汇总结果。
最终分析纳入了6项涉及4016例患者的RCT。无论性别或所用肾上腺素浓度如何,EI组在预防PEP方面未显示出比SI组有任何显著益处(OR = 1.00,95% CI [0.68, 1.45],P = 0.98)。亚组差异检验无统计学意义,P值分别为0.66和0.28。在直肠非甾体抗炎药中添加局部用肾上腺素并未改善中度至重度PEP的发生率(OR = 0.94,P = 0.86)或高危患者中PEP发生率(OR = 1.14,95%,P = 0.73)。两组之间的感染率,包括胆管炎和脓毒症(OR = 0.63,P = 0.07)、胃肠道出血(OR = 1.25,P = 0.56)和手术相关死亡(OR = 0.71,P = 0.59)相似。
在预防PEP或减少其他手术相关不良事件方面,添加局部用肾上腺素并未显示出比单独使用直肠非甾体抗炎药有任何益处。