Suppr超能文献

用于主动脉弓退行性动脉瘤的自制开窗式医生改性支架移植物。

Homemade fenestrated physician-modified stent grafts for arch aortic degenerative aneurysms.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France.

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1133-1140.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.041. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the early- and medium-term outcomes of single- and double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular degenerative aortic arch aneurysm repair.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 52 patients from August 2013 through January 2021 who had undergone homemade fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative aortic aneurysms. In all cases, a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA) was fashioned and was the only one stented. For a double-fenestrated endograft, a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated both the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery was added.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients with degenerative aortic arch aneurysms were treated. Of the 52 patients, 36 were men, the mean age was 75 ± 8 years, 31% had received a single LSA fenestration, and 69% had undergone double-fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Of the 52 procedures, 5 (10%) were emergent procedures. The technical success was 100%. The median time required for stent graft modification was 22 ± 6 minutes. The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). Five patients (10%) had experienced a cerebrovascular event, including two transient ischemic attacks, one minor stroke with full neurologic recovery, and two with sequelae. Two patients (4%) had experienced perioperative retrograde dissection during follow-up. No patient had developed a type I, II, or III endoleak from the LSA. No patient had required reintervention. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 18 ± 11 months, no patient had required conversion to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, or paraplegia.

CONCLUSIONS

Single or double PMEG is a safe and suitable tool for the treatment of high morbidity pathology such as aortic arch degenerative aneurysm repair. In addition, this device can be used in patients requiring elective or emergency repair.

摘要

目的

我们评估了单开窗和双开窗医师改良血管内移植物(PMEG)在全腔内退行性主动脉弓动脉瘤修复中的早期和中期结果。

方法

我们对 2013 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月期间因退行性主动脉瘤接受自制开窗胸主动脉腔内修复术的 52 例患者的前瞻性数据进行了单中心回顾性分析。在所有病例中,均为左锁骨下动脉(LSA)制作了一个较小的远端开窗,且仅对其进行了支架置入。对于双开窗移植物,增加了一个较大的近端开窗,可同时包含头臂干和左颈总动脉。

结果

共治疗 52 例退行性主动脉弓动脉瘤患者。52 例患者中,男性 36 例,平均年龄 75±8 岁,31%接受了单一 LSA 开窗,69%接受了双开窗胸主动脉腔内修复术。52 例手术中,5 例(10%)为急诊手术。技术成功率为 100%。支架移植物修改所需的中位数时间为 22±6 分钟。30 天死亡率为 2%(n=1)。5 例(10%)患者发生脑血管事件,包括 2 例短暂性脑缺血发作、1 例轻度卒中伴完全神经恢复和 2 例留有后遗症。2 例(4%)患者在随访期间发生围手术期逆行夹层。无 LSA Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型内漏。无患者需要再次介入治疗。所有主动脉弓以上的血管均通畅。在平均 18±11 个月的随访中,无患者需要转为开放手术修复、主动脉破裂或截瘫。

结论

单开窗或双开窗 PMEG 是治疗主动脉弓退行性动脉瘤等高发病率病变的安全、合适的工具。此外,该装置可用于需要择期或急诊修复的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验