• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Continuing education programme on vaccines for primary healthcare professionals: mixed-method protocol.基层医疗保健专业人员疫苗继续教育计划:混合方法方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e060094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060094.
2
Process-evaluation and outcome-evaluation of a training programme for healthcare professionals in oncology to enhance their competencies in caring for patients with minor children: a study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study.对一项培训计划的过程评估和结果评估,该计划旨在提高肿瘤学医疗保健专业人员在照顾有未成年子女的患者方面的能力:一项随机对照试点研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 14;9(10):e032778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032778.
3
Randomised controlled trial of online continuing education for health professionals to improve the management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a study protocol.针对卫生专业人员开展在线继续教育以改善慢性疲劳综合征管理的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 May 10;7(5):e014133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014133.
4
Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol.评价一个复杂的综合跨部门心理肿瘤护理项目(isPO):一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e034141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034141.
5
Quality and safety in the transitional care of the elderly (phase 2): the study protocol of a quasi-experimental intervention study for a cross-level educational programme.老年人过渡性护理中的质量与安全(第二阶段):一项针对跨层次教育项目的准实验干预研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 31;4(7):e005962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005962.
6
Controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine chemoprophylaxis in SARS CoV2 infection in healthcare personnel in the hospital setting: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在医院环境中评估羟氯喹化学预防 SARS-CoV2 感染在医护人员中的疗效和安全性的对照、双盲、随机试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04400-4.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Determinants of vaccine hesitancy in Switzerland: study protocol of a mixed-methods national research programme.瑞士疫苗犹豫的决定因素:一项混合方法的全国性研究计划的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e032218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032218.
9
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
10
Developing a complex intervention to support timely engagement with palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in primary and secondary care in the UK: a study protocol.在英国初级和二级医疗保健中,为晚期癌症患者制定一项复杂干预措施以支持其及时接受姑息治疗:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e022835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022835.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost and value in e-learning: the perspective of the learner.电子学习中的成本与价值:学习者的视角
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Oct 4;4(4):201-202. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000239. eCollection 2018.
2
Sexual behaviour, human papillomavirus and its vaccine: a qualitative study of adolescents and parents in Andalusia.性行为、人乳头瘤病毒及其疫苗:安达卢西亚青少年和家长的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):1476. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11510-4.
3
The Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Associated Factors: "Vaccination Refusal Could Prolong the War of This Pandemic" - A Systematic Review.接受新冠疫苗的意愿及其相关因素:“拒绝接种疫苗可能会延长这场疫情之战”——一项系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jun 21;14:2609-2623. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S311074. eCollection 2021.
4
Mozambican Adolescents and Youths during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Knowledge and Awareness Gaps in the Provinces of Sofala and Tete.新冠疫情期间莫桑比克的青少年:索法拉省和太特省的知识与认知差距
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;9(3):321. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030321.
5
Attitudes towards Anti-SARS-CoV2 Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: Results from a National Survey in Italy.医护人员对 SARS-CoV2 疫苗接种的态度:来自意大利全国性调查的结果。
Viruses. 2021 Feb 26;13(3):371. doi: 10.3390/v13030371.
6
Improvement of Parent's awareness, knowledge, perception, and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination after a structured-educational intervention.家长在接受结构化教育干预后,对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的认知、接受度和可接受性的提高。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09962-1.
7
Using a Global Pandemic as a Teachable Moment to Promote Vaccine Literacy and Build Resilience to Misinformation.利用全球大流行作为一个教育契机,以促进疫苗知识普及并增强对错误信息的抵御能力。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S284-S285. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305906.
8
Educating healthcare providers to increase Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates: A Qualitative Systematic Review.教育医疗服务提供者以提高人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种率:一项定性系统评价
Vaccine X. 2019 Aug 5;3:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2019.100037. eCollection 2019 Dec 10.
9
Development and acceptability of a video-based vaccine promotion tutorial for obstetric care providers.基于视频的疫苗推广教程的开发和可接受性,供产科护理提供者使用。
Vaccine. 2019 May 1;37(19):2532-2536. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
10
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about vaccination in primary healthcare workers involved in the administration of systematic childhood vaccines, Barcelona, 2016/17.2016/17 年巴塞罗那参与系统儿童疫苗接种的初级保健工作者对疫苗接种的知识、态度和信念。
Euro Surveill. 2019 Feb;24(6). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.6.1800117.

基层医疗保健专业人员疫苗继续教育计划:混合方法方案。

Continuing education programme on vaccines for primary healthcare professionals: mixed-method protocol.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e060094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060094.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060094
PMID:35697454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9196173/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination is a fundamental intervention in disease prevention; therefore, the advice and recommendations of health professionals have a major influence on the population's decision to be vaccinated or not. Professionals must have sufficient competencies to carry out their work and recommend vaccination with evidence-based knowledge. The aim is to design and validate a strategy to improve professional competencies in vaccination to positively influence adherence and increase vaccination rates in the population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Training will be designed based on evidence and previous studies and piloted with healthcare providers. To test changes in knowledge, a pretest and post-test will be conducted. To test feasibility, a think-aloud method will be used with participants and triangulated with focus groups using SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis. Transfer will be measured using the questionnaire 'factors for the indirect evaluation of transfer' and an efficacy questionnaire 1½ months later; for satisfaction, an ad hoc questionnaire will be used. A summative approach will be used for the analysis of the focus groups and descriptive and bivariate statistics for the questionnaires.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Andalusian Research Ethics Committee, Spain (approval number: 0524-N-20). The results will be made available to the public at journal publications and scientific conferences.

摘要

简介

接种疫苗是疾病预防的基本干预措施;因此,卫生专业人员的建议和推荐对人群是否接种疫苗的决定有重大影响。专业人员必须具备足够的能力来开展工作,并以基于证据的知识来推荐接种疫苗。目的是设计和验证一项策略,以提高接种疫苗方面的专业能力,积极影响依从性并提高人群的疫苗接种率。

方法和分析

培训将基于证据和先前的研究进行设计,并在医疗保健提供者中进行试点。为了测试知识的变化,将进行前测和后测。为了测试可行性,将使用参与者的出声思维法,并结合使用 SWOT(优势、劣势、机会和威胁)分析的焦点小组进行三角验证。转移将使用问卷“间接评估转移的因素”和 1 个半月后的功效问卷进行衡量;对于满意度,将使用特定的问卷。将采用总结性方法对焦点小组进行分析,并对问卷进行描述性和双变量统计分析。

伦理和传播

这项研究得到了西班牙安达卢西亚研究伦理委员会的批准(批准号:0524-N-20)。研究结果将在期刊发表和科学会议上向公众公布。