Dann Kelly M, Hay Phillipa, Touyz Stephen
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Eat Disord. 2023 Mar-Apr;31(2):139-150. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2022.2076337. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
The current study explored interactions between emotion regulation (ER) and cognitive-behavioral flexibility in everyday life in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN). Participants were 97 female adults with current (57%) or past (43%) full or partial AN syndrome diagnosis. Participants completed the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Eating Disorder Flexibility Index, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale short form. Lower flexibility was a strong independent predictor of more severe ED-related cognitions and higher frequency of compensatory behaviors beyond individual differences in emotion regulation and mood. ER measures did not predict clinical characteristics. However, two interactions between flexibility and ER measures were observed which suggested there was a stronger association between greater flexibility and higher BMI for individuals with either higher levels of cognitive reappraisal use, or higher levels of global ER difficulties. Interactions between flexibility and emotion regulation provide evidence that co-occurring difficulties may impact clinical outcomes in AN.
当前的研究探讨了神经性厌食症(AN)患者在日常生活中情绪调节(ER)与认知行为灵活性之间的相互作用。参与者为97名成年女性,她们目前(57%)或过去(43%)被诊断为患有完全或部分AN综合征。参与者完成了情绪调节困难量表、情绪调节问卷、饮食失调灵活性指数、饮食失调检查问卷以及抑郁焦虑压力量表简版。较低的灵活性是更严重的饮食失调相关认知以及补偿行为更高频率的一个强有力的独立预测因素,这超出了情绪调节和情绪方面的个体差异。情绪调节测量指标并不能预测临床特征。然而,观察到灵活性与情绪调节测量指标之间存在两种相互作用,这表明对于认知重评使用水平较高或整体情绪调节困难水平较高的个体,更大的灵活性与更高的体重指数之间存在更强的关联。灵活性与情绪调节之间的相互作用提供了证据,表明同时出现的困难可能会影响神经性厌食症的临床结果。