Birnie G G, Thompson G G, Murray T, Watkinson G, Brodie M J
Gut. 1987 Mar;28(3):248-54. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.3.248.
Kinetic analysis was carried out after single intravenous (25 mg) and oral (200 mg) doses of the novel partial opioid agonist meptazinol (Meptid) in patients with non-cirrhotic liver disease (NCLD) and biopsy proven cirrhosis. Comparison was made with a group of patients with normal hepatic function. Elimination half-lives after the intravenous dose were slightly prolonged in the cirrhotics (n = 10; 4.2 +/- 0.6 h) compared with the control (n = 8; 2.7 +/- 0.2 h: p less than 0.05) and NCLD (n = 8; 3.2 +/- 0.5 h) groups. There was no significant difference in meptazinol plasma clearance between the groups (cirrhotics = 72 +/- 8 l/h; NCLD = 89 +/- 9 l/h; control = 83 +/- 10 l/h). After the oral dose, seven of 15 cirrhotic patients vomited but only one patient in each of the other groups was unable to tolerate the drug (p = 0.06). This may be explained by very much higher peak meptazinol concentrations in the cirrhotic (n = 8; 184 +/- 37 ng/ml, p less than 0.01) and NCLD (n = 8; 131 +/- 38 ng/ml, p less than 0.05) patients than those of the controls (n = 7; 53 +/- 12 ng/ml) reflecting a mean four-fold and two-fold increase in oral bioavailability respectively (cirrhotics: n = 8; 27.9 +/- 5.3%: p less than 0.001; NCLD: n = 7; 13.7 +/- 3.9% p less than 0.05; controls: n = 7; 6.5 +/- 1.3%). There was no evidence of accumulation after chronic dosing with 200 mg meptazinol four times daily for 13 doses in seven control, seven NCLD and six cirrhotic patients. There were no detectable differences in psychomotor function measured objectively using the Leeds Psychomotor Tester of subjectively by linear analogue scoring between the groups in all three parts of the study. The oral use of meptazinol in patients with chronic liver disease is associated more with the development of nausea and vomiting rather than excessive sedation. These data suggest that dosage reduction in cirrhotic patients is advisable particularly if the drug is taken by mouth.
在非肝硬化肝病(NCLD)患者和经活检证实为肝硬化的患者中,单次静脉注射(25mg)和口服(200mg)新型部分阿片类激动剂美普他酚(Meptid)后进行了动力学分析。并与一组肝功能正常的患者进行了比较。肝硬化患者静脉注射剂量后的消除半衰期(n = 10;4.2±0.6小时)与对照组(n = 8;2.7±0.2小时:p<0.05)和NCLD组(n = 8;3.2±0.5小时)相比略有延长。各组间美普他酚的血浆清除率无显著差异(肝硬化组 = 72±8 l/h;NCLD组 = 89±9 l/h;对照组 = 83±10 l/h)。口服给药后,15例肝硬化患者中有7例呕吐,但其他组每组仅有1例患者不能耐受该药物(p = 0.06)。这可能是由于肝硬化患者(n = 8;184±37 ng/ml,p<0.01)和NCLD患者(n = 8;131±38 ng/ml,p<0.05)中美普他酚的峰值浓度远高于对照组(n = 7;53±12 ng/ml),分别反映出口服生物利用度平均增加了四倍和两倍(肝硬化组:n = 8;27.9±5.3%:p<0.001;NCLD组:n = 7;13.7±3.9%,p<0.05;对照组:n = 7;6.5±1.3%)。在7例对照患者、7例NCLD患者和6例肝硬化患者中,每日4次、每次200mg美普他酚连续给药13剂后,没有蓄积的证据。在研究的所有三个部分中,使用利兹精神运动测试仪客观测量或通过线性模拟评分主观测量,各组间精神运动功能均未发现可检测到的差异。慢性肝病患者口服美普他酚更多地与恶心和呕吐的发生有关,而不是过度镇静。这些数据表明,肝硬化患者尤其是口服该药物时,建议减少剂量。