Suppr超能文献

美普他酚与哌替啶用于分娩的双盲比较。

Double-blind comparison of meptazinol and pethidine in labour.

作者信息

Nicholas A D, Robson P J

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Apr;89(4):318-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04704.x.

Abstract

The analgesic efficacy and safety of intramuscular meptazinol and pethidine in the first stage of labour were compared in a randomized double-blind trial in 358 patients. Pain relief was measured on a verbal rating scale, maternal side effects were recorded and neonatal outcome assessed in the first 24 h. Pain relief during the first hour after injection was significantly greater in the meptazinol than in the pethidine group at 45 and 60 min. Thereafter, there was no difference between the treatments, and the duration of action was approximately the same. Twenty-eight per cent of patients experienced side effects after meptazinol compared with 35% after pethidine. The commonest were nausea and vomiting with a similar incidence in both groups. Most of the neonatal observations revealed no difference between the two drugs, but significantly more babies whose mothers had received meptazinol had an Apgar score of greater than or equal to 8 at 1 min after birth.

摘要

在一项针对358例患者的随机双盲试验中,比较了肌肉注射美普他酚和哌替啶在分娩第一阶段的镇痛效果和安全性。采用语言评分量表测量疼痛缓解情况,记录产妇的副作用,并评估新生儿出生后24小时内的结局。注射后第一小时内,美普他酚组在45分钟和60分钟时的疼痛缓解明显优于哌替啶组。此后,两种治疗方法之间没有差异,作用持续时间大致相同。28%的患者在使用美普他酚后出现副作用,而使用哌替啶后这一比例为35%。最常见的是恶心和呕吐,两组发生率相似。大多数新生儿观察结果显示两种药物之间没有差异,但母亲接受美普他酚治疗的婴儿在出生后1分钟时Apgar评分大于或等于8分的明显更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验