• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种低水平激光疗法在第三磨牙手术后的疗效比较——一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。

Efficacy of two low-level laser therapy protocols following lower third molar surgery - a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Estomatologia, Goiânia, Brasil.

Universidade Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Cirurgia, Goiânia, Brasil.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022 Apr 30;35(1):31-38. doi: 10.54589/aol.35/1/31.

DOI:10.54589/aol.35/1/31
PMID:35700539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10283399/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to test two low-level laser therapy protocols by evaluating pain control, swelling and trismus in the postoperative period of lower third molar surgeries. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Patients presenting two symmetrically impacted mandibular third molars were included. One side was randomly assigned for LLLT applied immediately after surgery (T1) and then after 24 (T2) and 48 hours (T3) (Protocol A). The other side received LLLT applied immediately after surgery and placebo after 24 and 48 hours (Protocol B). LLLT was given by intraoral application (660nm, 5 J/cm2, 10 s, 20 mW, 4 points) followed by extraoral application (789 nm, 30 J/cm2, 20 s, 60 mW, 8 points). The placebo application was similar to that of the experimental side but with laser simulation. The primary outcomes were pain control, swelling and trismus intensity at T1, T2, T3 and 7 days after surgery (T4). Data were analyzedbyANOVArepeated measures and Wilcoxon test (p<.05). The final sample consisted of 21 patients (42 teeth). There were no statistical differences for pain level between protocols A and B over time (p= .909), although the amount of analgesic medication was lower with protocol A at T2 (p=.022). There were no differences in swelling (p=.958) or trismus (p=.837) between the protocols used over time. Both protocols performed similarly for pain control, swelling and trismus. Therefore, for practical reasons, a single laser application in the immediate postoperative period could be indicated for the management of postoperative discomfort in lower third molar surgery.

摘要

本研究旨在通过评估下颌第三磨牙手术后的疼痛控制、肿胀和牙关紧闭情况,测试两种低水平激光疗法方案。这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验。纳入了具有双侧对称埋伏下颌第三磨牙的患者。一侧随机分配接受术后即刻应用低水平激光疗法(T1),然后在 24 小时(T2)和 48 小时(T3)时应用(方案 A)。另一侧接受术后即刻应用低水平激光疗法和 24 小时和 48 小时时应用安慰剂(方案 B)。低水平激光疗法通过口腔内应用(660nm,5 J/cm2,10s,20mW,4 点)和口腔外应用(789nm,30J/cm2,20s,60mW,8 点)进行。安慰剂应用与实验组相似,但采用激光模拟。主要结局是在术后即刻(T1)、24 小时(T2)、48 小时(T3)和 7 天(T4)时疼痛控制、肿胀和牙关紧闭的严重程度。采用重复测量方差分析和 Wilcoxon 检验进行数据分析(p<.05)。最终样本包括 21 例患者(42 颗牙)。在方案 A 和 B 之间,随着时间的推移,疼痛水平没有统计学差异(p=.909),尽管在 T2 时方案 A 应用的镇痛药剂量较低(p=.022)。在肿胀(p=.958)或牙关紧闭(p=.837)方面,两种方案之间没有差异。随着时间的推移,两种方案在疼痛控制、肿胀和牙关紧闭方面表现相似。因此,出于实际原因,在术后即刻单次应用激光可能是下颌第三磨牙手术术后不适管理的一种选择。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of two low-level laser therapy protocols following lower third molar surgery - a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.两种低水平激光疗法在第三磨牙手术后的疗效比较——一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022 Apr 30;35(1):31-38. doi: 10.54589/aol.35/1/31.
2
Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)--intraoral and extraoral--on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar.安慰剂对照随机临床试验研究两种不同低水平激光疗法(LLLT)——口腔内和口腔外——对下颌第三磨牙拔出术后牙关紧闭和面部肿胀的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):641-5. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0684-1. Epub 2009 May 31.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of the effect of low-level laser therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.低强度激光疗法对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后面部肿胀影响的三维评估:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;21(9):1107-1113. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_18.
4
Efficacy of a single dose of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar extraction surgery.单次低强度激光治疗对减轻第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
5
Low-level laser therapy using laser diode 940 nm in the mandibular impacted third molar surgery: double-blind randomized clinical trial.940nm 激光二极管低水平激光疗法在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的应用:双盲随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01434-1.
6
Extraoral low-level laser therapy can decrease pain but not edema and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.口腔外低水平激光疗法可减轻下颌阻生第三磨牙拔出术后疼痛,但不能减轻水肿和牙关紧闭:一项随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02461-2.
7
Is Low-Level Laser Therapy Effective in the Management of Pain and Swelling After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?低强度激光疗法对下颌第三磨牙手术后疼痛和肿胀的管理有效吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1322.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
8
Effectiveness of Single Session of Low-Level Laser Therapy with a 940 nm Wavelength Diode Laser on Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Impacted Third Molar Surgery.波长940纳米二极管激光单次低强度激光治疗对阻生第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的疗效
Photomed Laser Surg. 2016 Sep;34(9):406-10. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4101. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of pain, facial swelling, and postoperative trismus after a lower third molar extraction. A preliminary study.低水平激光疗法在减轻下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、面部肿胀和张口受限方面的疗效:一项初步研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 May;27(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0936-8. Epub 2011 May 27.
10
Effect of low-level laser therapy after extraction of impacted lower third molars.低位激光疗法对下颌第三磨牙阻生拔除术后的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 May;28(3):845-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1174-4. Epub 2012 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in patients undergoing lower third molar extraction: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.评估低强度激光疗法对接受下颌第三磨牙拔除术患者的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jan 1;30(1):e129-e134. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26894.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Dexamethasone superior to Ketorolac in reducing pain, swelling and trismus following mandibular third molar removal? A split mouth triple-blind randomized clinical trial.地塞米松在减轻下颌第三磨牙拔除后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭方面是否优于酮咯酸?一项随机、三盲、自身对照临床试验。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Mar 1;26(2):e141-e150. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24088.
2
Is Low-Level Laser Therapy Effective for Pain Control After the Surgical Removal of Unerupted Third Molars? A Randomized Trial.低强度激光疗法对未萌出第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛控制是否有效?一项随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;78(2):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of the effect of low-level laser therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
低强度激光疗法对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后面部肿胀影响的三维评估:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;21(9):1107-1113. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_18.
4
Does the use of amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in third molar surgery reduce the risk of postoperative infection? A systematic review with meta-analysis.在第三磨牙手术中使用阿莫西林/阿莫西林-克拉维酸是否能降低术后感染风险?一项Meta分析的系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;48(2):263-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Pharmacological Control of Complications Following to Third Molar Removal: Evidence Based on A Meta-Analysis.第三磨牙拔除术后并发症的药物控制:基于荟萃分析的证据
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2019 Jan;69(1):5-11. doi: 10.1055/a-0637-8948. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Piezoelectric compared with conventional rotary osteotomy for the prevention of postoperative sequelae and complications after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.压电式与传统旋转截骨术在下颌第三磨牙手术拔除后预防术后后遗症和并发症的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;54(10):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
Is Low-Level Laser Therapy Effective in the Management of Pain and Swelling After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?低强度激光疗法对下颌第三磨牙手术后疼痛和肿胀的管理有效吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1322.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
8
Efficacy of a single dose of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar extraction surgery.单次低强度激光治疗对减轻第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of complication after mandibular third molar surgery.一项关于低强度激光疗法在下颌第三磨牙手术后并发症管理中疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(6):1779-88. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1634-0. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Effects of ozone therapy on pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar surgery.臭氧疗法对第三磨牙手术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 11.