• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与奥瑞珠单抗相比,富马酸二甲酯的感染率较低,与感染相关的医疗保健费用也较低。

Dimethyl fumarate is associated with lower rates of infection and lower infection-related healthcare costs when compared with ocrelizumab.

机构信息

OhioHealth Multiple Sclerosis Center, Columbus, OH, United States.

South Shore Neurologic Associates, Islip, NY, United States.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103921. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2022.103921
PMID:35700674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infections in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) may have a detrimental effect on disease progression, risk of hospitalization, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). The infection risk and HRU costs may vary between disease-modifying therapies (DMTs); however, the individual risks and differences associated with DMTs are not well characterized. Some DMTs may increase the risk for infections in PwMS; however, previous studies have reported an intact humoral immune response in dimethyl fumarate (DMF)-treated patients. The objective was to compare infection-related HRU and healthcare costs (HCCs) between PwMS treated with DMF or ocrelizumab (OCR).

METHODS

Eligible patients were identified from the Optum US claims database between April 2017 and September 2020 (DMF n = 1429; OCR n = 3170). Patients were followed from index date to first occurrence of: (1) end of study, (2) end of insurance eligibility, (3) discontinuation of index DMT, or (4) switch from index DMT to another DMT. Outcomes were annualized rate of infection encounters (defined as infection encounters [n] during follow-up window / days followed [n] × 365); annualized infection-related HCCs (defined as aggregated costs of infection encounters during follow-up window / days followed [n] × 365); location-specific infections, and overall infection-related events. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 method was used; PS was calculated via logistic regression for probability of DMF treatment conditional on demographics and comorbidities. Mean differences (MD) were reported for infection encounter measures.

RESULTS

After PSM, DMF and OCR cohorts (n = 1094 in each cohort) were balanced based on baseline characteristics (standardized MD of adjusted baseline characteristics <0.1). Mean (standard deviation) follow-up was 296 (244) days for DMF patients and 297 (243) for OCR patients. DMF patients experienced lower annualized rates of overall infection encounters vs OCR patients (MD -0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.92 to -0.11], p = 0.01). When stratified by type of infection encounter, DMF patients experienced significantly lower annualized rates of outpatient (MD [95% CI]: -0.44 [-0.80 to -0.08], p = 0.02) and inpatient/hospitalization infection encounters (-0.08 [-0.14 to -0.02], p<0.01) vs OCR patients. A trend towards a shorter duration of infection-related hospitalization in the DMF vs the OCR group was observed (MD [95% CI]: -2.20 [-4.73 to 0.26] days, p = 0.08). The most common infection types in both DMT groups were urinary tract infections, sepsis, and pneumonia. DMF patients experienced lower annualized infection-related HCCs (MD [95% CI]: -$3642 [-$6380 to -$904], p < 0.01) vs OCR patients, which were driven largely by infection-related hospitalization costs (-$3639 [-$6019 to -$1259], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DMF-treated patients PS-matched with OCR patients experienced lower annualized rates of infection encounters and lower infection-related HCCs.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)患者的感染可能对疾病进展、住院风险和医疗资源利用(HRU)产生不利影响。疾病修正治疗(DMT)之间的感染风险和 HRU 成本可能有所不同;然而,与 DMT 相关的个体风险和差异尚未得到很好的描述。一些 DMT 可能会增加 MS 患者感染的风险;然而,之前的研究报告称,在用二甲基富马酸(DMF)治疗的患者中存在完整的体液免疫反应。目的是比较 DMF 或奥瑞珠单抗(OCR)治疗的 MS 患者与感染相关的 HRU 和医疗保健费用(HCC)。

方法

从 2017 年 4 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,从 Optum US 索赔数据库中确定符合条件的患者(DMF 组 n=1429;OCR 组 n=3170)。从索引日期到以下任何事件的首次发生进行随访:(1)研究结束,(2)保险资格结束,(3)索引 DMT 停药,或(4)索引 DMT 转换为另一种 DMT。结果是感染发生率(定义为随访期间的感染发生率[n] / 随访天数[n]×365);感染相关 HCC 年度发生率(定义为随访期间感染发生率的累计成本 / 随访天数[n]×365);特定部位感染和总体感染相关事件。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)1:1 方法;通过逻辑回归计算 DMF 治疗的概率作为条件,使用协变量和合并症作为 PS。对于感染发生率的测量,报告了平均值差异(MD)。

结果

在 PSM 后,DMF 和 OCR 队列(每个队列 n=1094)基于基线特征平衡(调整基线特征的标准化 MD <0.1)。DMF 患者的平均(标准偏差)随访时间为 296(244)天,OCR 患者为 297(243)天。与 OCR 患者相比,DMF 患者的总感染发生率年度率较低(MD-0.51 [95%置信区间(CI):-0.92 至 -0.11],p=0.01)。按感染发生率类型分层时,DMF 患者的门诊(MD [95% CI]:-0.44 [-0.80 至 -0.08],p=0.02)和住院/住院感染发生率显著较低,与 OCR 患者相比。与 OCR 组相比,DMF 组观察到感染相关住院时间缩短(MD [95% CI]:-2.20 [-4.73 至 0.26]天,p=0.08)。在这两种 DMT 组中,最常见的感染类型是尿路感染、败血症和肺炎。与 OCR 患者相比,DMF 治疗的患者感染相关 HCC 年度发生率较低(MD [95% CI]:-3642 [美元] [-6380 至 -904],p < 0.01),这主要是由于感染相关的住院费用较低(-3639 [美元] [-6019 至 -1259],p < 0.01)。

结论

与 OCR 患者匹配的 DMF 治疗患者的感染发生率和感染相关 HCC 年度发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Dimethyl fumarate is associated with lower rates of infection and lower infection-related healthcare costs when compared with ocrelizumab.与奥瑞珠单抗相比,富马酸二甲酯的感染率较低,与感染相关的医疗保健费用也较低。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103921. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US.美国首发平台治疗药物转换的 MS 患者中,富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德和特立氟胺的疗效比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
3
Real-World Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Initiating First- Versus Second- or Later-Line Treatment With Ocrelizumab.使用奥瑞珠单抗进行一线治疗与二线或后续治疗的多发性硬化症患者的真实世界临床和经济结果
Neurol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1709-1728. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00523-3. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Electronic health record data for assessing risk of hospitalization for COVID-19: Methodological considerations applied to multiple sclerosis.电子健康记录数据用于评估 COVID-19 住院风险:应用于多发性硬化症的方法学考虑。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Mar;71:104512. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104512. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for ocrelizumab in the real-world of the Campania Region of Italy.在意大利坎帕尼亚地区的真实世界中,奥瑞珠单抗的持续使用、依从性、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Neurol. 2022 Dec;269(12):6504-6511. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11320-7. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Persistence and adherence to ocrelizumab compared with other disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in U.S. commercial claims data.在美国商业索赔数据中,与其他多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法相比,奥瑞珠单抗的持续使用和坚持使用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 May;27(5):639-649. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20413. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.与其他用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法相比,奥瑞珠单抗相关的工作生产力结果。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):183-196. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症口服治疗的临床、利用和成本结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):129-140. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.129.
9
Associations of Disease-Modifying Therapies With COVID-19 Severity in Multiple Sclerosis.疾病修正疗法与多发性硬化症中 COVID-19 严重程度的关联。
Neurology. 2021 Nov 9;97(19):e1870-e1885. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012753. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Real-world experience of ocrelizumab initiation in a diverse multiple sclerosis population.奥瑞珠单抗在多种多发性硬化症患者中的真实世界应用经验。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Aug;53:103021. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103021. Epub 2021 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis patients treated with anti-CD20s who switched to fumarates: a retrospective analysis of a US healthcare claims database.改用富马酸盐治疗的接受抗CD20治疗的多发性硬化症患者的临床特征和治疗结果:一项对美国医疗保健索赔数据库的回顾性分析
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Mar;14(3):e240071. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0071. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
The relative risk of infection in people with multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying treatment: a systematic review of observational studies.使用疾病修正治疗的多发性硬化症患者的感染相对风险:观察性研究的系统评价
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2555-2569. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08018-9. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
3
Real-world infection risk in multiple sclerosis patients on long-term immunomodulatory treatments.
长期接受免疫调节治疗的多发性硬化症患者的真实世界感染风险。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025 Feb;94:106236. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.106236. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
4
De-escalation of Disease-Modifying Therapy for People with Multiple Sclerosis Due to Safety Considerations: Characterizing 1-Year Outcomes in 25 People Who Switched from Ocrelizumab to Diroximel Fumarate.由于安全性考虑对多发性硬化症患者进行疾病修饰疗法的降级:25 名从奥瑞珠单抗转换为富马酸二甲酯的患者在 1 年的结局特征。
Adv Ther. 2024 Aug;41(8):3059-3075. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02902-0. Epub 2024 Jun 11.