Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA), CSIC, Serrano 115 dpdo, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156654. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156654. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
Most methods for mapping groundwater vulnerability are based on the excessively simplistic approach that aquifer recharge is produced by vertical infiltration. The novel Land Use-Intrinsic Vulnerability (LU-IV) procedure assesses groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution over the entire territory, including aquifers catchment areas. In this research, it was analysed if the delineation of nitrate vulnerable zones (NVZs) would be improved by introducing a new parameter representing the risk associated with soil permeability (parameter S) in the procedure. Different versions of parameter S were tested: S_HC (risk associated with soil hydraulic conductivity), S_St+G+S (risk associated with the stone, gravel and sand fraction of the soil) and S_C (risk associated with the clay fraction). The study was undertaken in the catchment areas of the Oja and Tirón alluvial aquifers (Spain). The efficacy of the following six models was compared: Model 1 (original LU-IV procedure), Model 2 (LU-IV' procedure using parameter S_HC), Model 3 (LU-IV' procedure using parameter S_St+G+S), Model 4 (LU-IV' procedure using parameter S_C), Model 5 (LU-DRASTIC-COP procedure, based on DRASTIC-COP method), and Model 6 (designated NVZ). Catchment scale validations of the six models showed similar, highly significant correlations between the percent coverages of the estimated NVZs and those of the alluvial areas polluted by nitrate for Models 1 to 4. Models 5 and 6 did not show any significant results. In light of these results, Models 1 to 4 were considered the best predictors of nitrate pollution and the best methods for NVZ delineation. Results support the idea that including a parameter S in the LU-IV' procedure is not essential since equivalent results were obtained from the original LU-IV procedure. So, the LU-IV procedure should be considered the best and simplest method of those tested for accurately delineating NVZs.
大多数地下水脆弱性制图方法都是基于含水层补给仅由垂直入渗产生的过于简单的方法。新的土地利用固有脆弱性(LU-IV)程序评估了整个地区(包括含水层集水区)的硝酸盐污染地下水脆弱性。在这项研究中,分析了在该程序中引入代表土壤渗透性相关风险的新参数(参数 S)是否可以改善硝酸盐脆弱带(NVZ)的划定。测试了不同版本的参数 S:S_HC(与土壤水力传导率相关的风险)、S_St+G+S(与土壤的石头、砾石和砂粒部分相关的风险)和 S_C(与土壤的粘土部分相关的风险)。该研究在奥贾和蒂隆冲积含水层(西班牙)的集水区进行。比较了以下六种模型的功效:模型 1(原始 LU-IV 程序)、模型 2(使用参数 S_HC 的 LU-IV'程序)、模型 3(使用参数 S_St+G+S 的 LU-IV'程序)、模型 4(使用参数 S_C 的 LU-IV'程序)、模型 5(基于 DRASTIC-COP 方法的 LU-DRASTIC-COP 程序)和模型 6(指定的 NVZ)。在集水区尺度上对这六种模型进行验证的结果表明,在模型 1 到 4 中,估计的 NVZ 的覆盖百分比与被硝酸盐污染的冲积区之间存在高度显著的相关性。模型 5 和 6 没有显示出任何显著的结果。鉴于这些结果,模型 1 到 4 被认为是预测硝酸盐污染的最佳指标,也是 NVZ 划定的最佳方法。结果支持了在 LU-IV'程序中包含参数 S 并不重要的观点,因为从原始的 LU-IV 程序中获得了等效的结果。因此,LU-IV 程序应被视为测试过的用于准确划定 NVZ 的最佳和最简单的方法。