• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于实验室的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测方法的评估。

Evaluation of a laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Institute of Medical Virology, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jun 14;60(9):1478-1485. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0360. Print 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2022-0360
PMID:35700973
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Antigen tests are an essential part of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies. Rapid antigen tests are easy to use but less sensitive compared to nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) and less suitable for large-scale testing. In contrast, laboratory-based antigen tests are suitable for high-throughput immunoanalyzers. Here we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the laboratory-based Siemens Healthineers SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (CoV2Ag) assay.

METHODS

In a public test center, from 447 individuals anterior nasal swab specimens as well as nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected. The nasal swab specimens were collected in sample inactivation medium and measured using the CoV2Ag assay. The nasopharyngeal swab specimens were measured by RT-PCR. Additionally, 9,046 swab specimens obtained for screening purposes in a tertiary care hospital were analyzed and positive CoV2Ag results confirmed by NAT.

RESULTS

In total, 234/447 (52.3%) participants of the public test center were positive for SARS-CoV-2-RNA. Viral lineage B1.1.529 was dominant during the study. Sensitivity and specificity of the CoV2Ag assay were 88.5% (95%CI: 83.7-91.9%) and 99.5% (97.4-99.9%), respectively. Sensitivity increased to 93.7% (97.4-99.9%) and 98.7% (97.4-99.9%) for swab specimens with cycle threshold values <30 and <25, respectively. Out of 9,046 CoV2Ag screening tests from hospitalized patients, 21 (0.2%) swab specimens were determined as false-positive by confirmatory NAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Using sample tubes containing inactivation medium the laboratory-based high-throughput CoV2Ag assay is a very specific and highly sensitive assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swab specimens including the B1.1.529 variant. In low prevalence settings confirmation of positive CoV2Ag results by SARS-CoV-2-RNA testing is recommended.

摘要

目的

抗原检测是 SARS-CoV-2 检测策略的重要组成部分。快速抗原检测使用方便,但与核酸扩增检测(NAT)相比敏感性较低,不太适合大规模检测。相比之下,基于实验室的抗原检测适用于高通量免疫分析仪。在此,我们评估了基于实验室的西门子 Healthineers SARS-CoV-2 抗原(CoV2Ag)检测的诊断性能。

方法

在一个公共检测中心,从 447 名个体的前鼻拭子标本和鼻咽拭子标本中采集样本。将鼻拭子标本采集在样本灭活介质中,并使用 CoV2Ag 检测进行测量。鼻咽拭子标本通过 RT-PCR 进行测量。此外,对一家三级保健医院为筛查目的采集的 9046 个拭子标本进行了分析,并通过 NAT 对阳性 CoV2Ag 结果进行了确认。

结果

在公共检测中心,共有 234/447(52.3%)名参与者 SARS-CoV-2-RNA 检测呈阳性。在研究期间,B1.1.529 谱系占主导地位。CoV2Ag 检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.5%(95%CI:83.7-91.9%)和 99.5%(97.4-99.9%)。对于循环阈值<30 和<25 的拭子标本,灵敏度分别提高至 93.7%(97.4-99.9%)和 98.7%(97.4-99.9%)。在来自住院患者的 9046 次 CoV2Ag 筛查检测中,21(0.2%)个拭子标本经确认性 NAT 检测被确定为假阳性。

结论

使用含有灭活介质的样本管,基于实验室的高通量 CoV2Ag 检测是一种非常特异和高度敏感的检测方法,可用于检测包括 B1.1.529 变体在内的鼻拭子标本中的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原。在低流行率环境下,建议通过 SARS-CoV-2-RNA 检测对阳性 CoV2Ag 结果进行确认。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay.基于实验室的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测方法的评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jun 14;60(9):1478-1485. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0360. Print 2022 Aug 26.
2
Performance of High Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing Compared to Nucleic Acid Testing.高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与核酸检测的性能比较。
Lab Med. 2023 Mar 7;54(2):e54-e57. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac107.
3
High performance of the automated ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in nasopharyngeal samples with high viral load.自动化 ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测系统在高病毒载量的鼻咽样本中具有出色的性能。
Int Microbiol. 2023 Aug;26(3):471-474. doi: 10.1007/s10123-022-00311-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
4
Comparison of a novel antigen detection test with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.新型抗原检测试验与逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染实验室诊断的比较。
Infection. 2023 Feb;51(1):91-96. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01832-9. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Evaluation of the INDICAID COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in Symptomatic Populations and Asymptomatic Community Testing.评估 INDICAID COVID-19 快速抗原检测在有症状人群和无症状社区检测中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0034221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00342-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (CoV2Ag) chemiluminescent immunoassay for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infection: a pooled analysis.西门子 SARS-CoV-2 抗原(CoV2Ag)化学发光免疫分析诊断急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断准确性:汇总分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 12;61(7):1133-1139. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1287. Print 2023 Jun 27.
8
Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer.利用即时分子检测技术对残余检测缓冲液进行检测,避免 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测出现假阳性结果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0063922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00639-22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests With Self-Collected vs Health Care Worker-Collected Nasal and Throat Swab Specimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial.COVID-19 抗原快速检测试剂:与自我采集和医护人员采集的鼻腔和咽喉拭子标本的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2344295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44295.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen based on IgG colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip.基于IgG胶体金免疫层析试纸条的新型冠状病毒2抗原快速检测
Mikrochim Acta. 2025 Jun 12;192(7):420. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07299-3.
2
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
3
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于仪器的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断检测的临床准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5.
4
Nasal swab is a good alternative sample for detecting SARS-CoV-2 with rapid antigen test: A meta-analysis.鼻拭子是用快速抗原检测法检测 SARS-CoV-2 的良好替代样本:一项荟萃分析。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023 Mar-Apr;52:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102548. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
High performance of the automated ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in nasopharyngeal samples with high viral load.自动化 ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测系统在高病毒载量的鼻咽样本中具有出色的性能。
Int Microbiol. 2023 Aug;26(3):471-474. doi: 10.1007/s10123-022-00311-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.