Jacobson A, Koehler J E, Jones-Brown C
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987 Apr;38(4):386-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.38.4.386.
To test the hypothesis that patients' histories of having been physically or sexually assaulted are often not elicited in routine clinical assessments, the authors reviewed the charts of 100 inpatients for any mention of such experiences. The data were compared with results of earlier research interviews in which the same 100 patients were questioned directly about assault experiences. Comparison of the two sets of data showed that only 9 percent of the assault histories obtained during research interviews were mentioned on the patients' charts. Because of the clinical significance of most major assaults, the authors recommend that clinicians routinely inquire about assault history.
为了验证在常规临床评估中常常无法了解到患者遭受身体或性侵犯的病史这一假设,作者查阅了100名住院患者的病历,看是否有此类经历的记录。将这些数据与早期研究访谈的结果进行比较,在早期研究访谈中,对这100名相同的患者直接询问了侵犯经历。两组数据的比较显示,在研究访谈中获得的侵犯病史中,只有9%在患者病历中有记录。由于大多数重大侵犯具有临床意义,作者建议临床医生常规询问侵犯病史。