Rodgers James A, Schwikert Stephen T
Bureau of Wildlife Diversity Conservation, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 4005 South Main Street, Gainesville, FL 32601-9099, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):216-224. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00316.x.
Outdoor recreation and ecotourism can have negative effects on wildlife species, so it is important to determine buffer zones within which activities near critical wildlife areas are limited. We exposed 23 species of waterbirds ( Pelecaniformes, Ciconiiformes, Falconiformes, Charadriiformes) to the direct approach of a personal watercraft ( PWC) and an outboard-powered boat to determine their flush distances. We used 11 sites with a mixture of low, moderate, and high amounts of human activity along the east and west coasts of Florida during September-November 1998 and April-June 1999. We detected considerable variation in flush distances among individuals within the same species and among species in response to both types of vessels. Average flush distances for the PWC ranged from 19.5 m ( Least Tern [ Sterna antillarum]) to 49.5 m (Osprey [ Pandion haliaetus]), whereas average flush distances for the outboard-powered boat ranged from 23.4 m ( Forster's Tern [ S. forsteri]) to 57.9 m (Osprey). Larger species generally exhibited greater average flush distances for both types of watercraft. A comparison of the flush distances elicited by each watercraft indicated that only the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) exhibited significantly larger flush distances ( t test, p < 0.01) in response to the approach of the PWC than in response to the outboard, whereas four species (Anhinga [Anhinga anhinga], Little Blue Heron [Egretta caerulea], Willet [Catoptrophorus semipalmatus], and Osprey) exhibited significantly larger flush distances ( t test, p < 0.05) in response to the approach of the outboard-powered boat than in response to the PWC. Eleven species (68.8%) showed no significant difference ( t test, p> 0.05) in their flush distances in response to the fast-moving PWC and the outboard-powered boat. Our data suggest that a single buffer-zone distance can be developed for both PWC and outboard-powered vessels. Buffer zones of 180 m for wading birds, 140 m for terns and gulls, 100 m for plovers and sandpipers, and 150 m for ospreys would minimize their disturbance at foraging and loafing sites in Florida.
户外休闲和生态旅游可能会对野生动物物种产生负面影响,因此确定缓冲区很重要,在这些缓冲区内,靠近关键野生动物区域的活动将受到限制。我们让23种水鸟(鹈形目、鹳形目、隼形目、鸻形目)面对一艘个人水上摩托艇(PWC)和一艘舷外发动机驱动船的直接靠近,以确定它们的惊飞距离。1998年9月至11月以及1999年4月至6月期间,我们在佛罗里达州东海岸和西海岸的11个地点进行了研究,这些地点的人类活动程度有低、中、高之分。我们发现,同一物种内的个体以及不同物种对这两种船只靠近的惊飞距离存在相当大的差异。PWC的平均惊飞距离从19.5米( least Tern [Sterna antillarum])到49.5米(鹗 [Pandion haliaetus])不等,而舷外发动机驱动船的平均惊飞距离从23.4米(Forster's Tern [S. forsteri])到57.9米(鹗)不等。一般来说,体型较大的物种对这两种船只的平均惊飞距离都更大。对每种船只引发的惊飞距离进行比较后发现,只有大蓝鹭(Ardea herodias)对PWC靠近的惊飞距离显著大于对舷外发动机驱动船靠近的惊飞距离(t检验,p < 0.01),而有四种物种(美洲蛇鹈 [Anhinga anhinga]、小蓝鹭 [Egretta caerulea]、长嘴鹬 [Catoptrophorus semipalmatus] 和鹗)对舷外发动机驱动船靠近的惊飞距离显著大于对PWC靠近的惊飞距离(t检验,p < 0.05)。11种物种(68.8%)对快速移动的PWC和舷外发动机驱动船靠近的惊飞距离没有显著差异(t检验,p > 0.05)。我们的数据表明,可以为PWC和舷外发动机驱动船制定单一的缓冲区距离。对于涉禽,180米的缓冲区、对于燕鸥和鸥类,140米的缓冲区、对于鸻和鹬类,100米的缓冲区以及对于鹗,150米的缓冲区,将能最大限度减少它们在佛罗里达州觅食和休息地点受到的干扰。