• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良的 AO 胸骨分类系统的验证。

Validation of the modified AO sternum classification system.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse 6000 Lucerne 16, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1421-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03302-2. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-022-03302-2
PMID:35704065
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) foundation along with the Orthopaedic. Trauma Association (OTA) introduced a new classification for sternal fractures in 2018 aiming to provide greater uniformity and clinical utility for the surgical community. A previous validation study identified some critical issues such as the differentiation between type A and B fractures and localization of the fracture either in the manubrium or in the body. Due to the moderate agreement in inter- and intra-observer variability, some modifications were proposed in order to improve the performance of the classification. The aim of this study was to re-assess the inter- and intra-observer variability after adding modifications to the classification. Our hypothesis was that a significative improvement of inter- and intra-observer variability could be achieved.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with sternal fractures were analyzed by six. Junior and six senior surgeons independently. Two assessments were performed with an interval of 6 weeks. The kappa (K) value was calculated in order to assess inter- and intra-observer variability.

RESULTS

The overall mean kappa value for inter-observer variability improved from 0.364 to 0.468 (p < 0.001). Inter-observer variability mean for location was 0.573 (SD 0.221) and for type was 0.441 (SD: 0.181). Intra-observer variability showed a mean of 0.703 (SD: 0.153) with a statistic significant improvement when compared to the previous study (mean 0.414, SD: 0.256, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By modifying the AO/OTA classification of sternal fractures, the inter- and intra-observer variability improved and now shows moderate to substantial agreement.

摘要

简介

Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) 基金会与骨科创伤协会 (OTA) 于 2018 年推出了一种新的胸骨骨折分类方法,旨在为外科医生提供更大的统一性和临床实用性。先前的验证研究发现了一些关键问题,例如 A 型和 B 型骨折的区分以及骨折是位于胸骨柄还是体部。由于在观察者间和观察者内的变异性方面存在中度一致性,因此提出了一些修改建议,以提高分类的性能。本研究旨在评估分类修改后观察者间和观察者内的变异性。我们的假设是,通过分类修改,可以显著提高观察者间和观察者内的变异性。

材料和方法

对 20 例胸骨骨折患者的 CT 扫描进行了分析,由 6 名初级外科医生和 6 名高级外科医生独立进行分析。两次评估之间间隔 6 周。为了评估观察者间和观察者内的变异性,计算了kappa (K) 值。

结果

观察者间变异性的总体平均 K 值从 0.364 提高到 0.468(p<0.001)。位置的观察者间变异性平均值为 0.573(SD 0.221),类型为 0.441(SD:0.181)。观察者内变异性的平均值为 0.703(SD:0.153),与之前的研究相比有显著改善(平均值 0.414,SD:0.256,p<0.001)。

结论

通过修改 AO/OTA 胸骨骨折分类,观察者间和观察者内的变异性得到了改善,现在显示出中度至高度的一致性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the modified AO sternum classification system.改良的 AO 胸骨分类系统的验证。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1421-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03302-2. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study.胸骨骨折的 AO/OTA 分类的组内和组间变异性:一项验证研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):735-739. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03289-2. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?计算机断层扫描(CT)是否能提高观察者间及观察者自身对桡骨远端骨折的AO、费尔南德斯和通用分类系统的一致性?
Injury. 2014 Oct;45(10):1579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.新型 AO/OTA 2018 肱骨近端骨折分类系统的可靠性和可重复性:三种不同分类系统的比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-0543-1.
5
Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures.广泛使用的分类法和胫骨平台骨折的“十段分类法”的观察者内和观察者间可靠性评估。
Knee. 2022 Mar;35:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
Posterior Protrusion Measures (PPM) as an Innovative Index in Classifying Plain Lateral Radiograph Images of Pertrochanteric Fracture Using the Revised AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) Classification.后凸突出测量(PPM)作为一种创新指标,用于使用修订的AO基金会/骨创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类法对转子间骨折的普通侧位X线图像进行分类。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 24;14(12):e32898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32898. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.瑞典骨折登记处中桡骨远端骨折分类的有效性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 26;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04473-5.
8
Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.与其他骨折分类系统相比,胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性是否更低?:以股骨近端转子区骨折作为对比模型的比较研究
Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.应用 CT 评估股骨转子间骨折的三维分类系统的组内和组间可靠性。
Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2682-2685. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.047. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
[Effectiveness validation of a novel comprehensive classification for intertrochanteric fractures].[一种新型股骨转子间骨折综合分类的有效性验证]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 15;37(4):417-422. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202211117.

本文引用的文献

1
Inter- and intraobserver reliability of morphological Mutch classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: A comparison of x-ray, two-, and three-dimensional CT imaging.肱骨近端大结节骨折 Mutch 形态学分类的影像学评估:X 线、二维和三维 CT 成像的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259646. eCollection 2021.
2
Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study.胸骨骨折的 AO/OTA 分类的组内和组间变异性:一项验证研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):735-739. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03289-2. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Osteosynthesis of sternal fractures with double locking compression plate fixation: a retrospective cohort study.
双锁定加压钢板固定治疗胸骨骨折的骨合成:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jan;30(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02526-z. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
4
Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review.创伤性胸骨骨折的治疗现状和结局:一项系统综述。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jun;43(6):1455-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3945-4. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018.《骨折与脱位分类汇编 - 2018》
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.
6
MDCT evaluation of sternal variations: Pictorial essay.MDCT对胸骨变异的评估:图谱文章
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2016 Apr-Jun;26(2):185-94. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.184407.
7
The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.三维 CT 成像对肱骨近端骨折分类和治疗建议的观察者内和观察者间可靠性的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Aug 6;96(15):1281-1286. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00199.
8
Traumatic sternal fracture: outcome following admission to a Thoracic Surgical Unit.
Injury. 2003 Dec;34(12):924-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00415-1.
9
Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of the scapula in the management of a child with a displaced intra-articular fracture of the glenoid.三维CT重建肩胛骨在治疗一名患有关节内移位的肩胛盂骨折儿童中的应用
Injury. 1994 Dec;25(10):679-80. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90014-0.
10
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.