Suppr超能文献

导管消融与风险因素修正抗心律失常药物治疗心房颤动的比较:一项随机对照试验(PRAGUE-25 试验)方案。

Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial).

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

Department of Cardiology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e056522. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056522.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has been documented to be superior to treatment by antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance. However, in obese patients, substantial weight loss was also associated with AF reduction. So far, no study has compared the modern non-invasive (AADs combined with risk factor modification (RFM)) approach with modern invasive (CA) treatment. The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy of modern invasive (CA) and non-invasive (AADs with risk factor management) treatment of AF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The trial will be a prospective, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. Patients with symptomatic AF and a body mass index >30 will be enrolled and randomised to the CA or RFM arm (RFM+AAD) in a 1:1 ratio. In the CA arm, pulmonary vein isolation (in combination with additional lesion sets in non-paroxysmal patients) will be performed. For patients in the RFM+AAD arm, the aim will be a 10% weight loss over 6-12 months, increased physical fitness and a reduction in alcohol consumption. The primary endpoint will be an episode of AF or regular atrial tachycardia lasting >30 s. The secondary endpoints include AF burden, clinical endpoints associated with AF reoccurrence, changes in the quality of life assessed using dedicated questionnaires, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic endpoints. An AF freedom of 65% in the RFM+AAD and of 60% in the CA is expected; therefore, 202 patients will be enrolled to achieve the non-inferiority with 80% power, 5% one-sided alpha and a non-inferiority margin of 12%.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The PRAGUE-25 trial will determine if modern non-invasive AF treatment strategies are non-inferior to CA. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady. Results of the study will be disseminated on scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. After the end of follow-up, data will be available upon request to principal investigator.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04011800).

摘要

介绍

心房颤动(AF)的患病率为 2%,是最常见的心律失常。导管消融(CA)在维持窦性心律方面已被证明优于抗心律失常药物(AAD)治疗。然而,在肥胖患者中,大量的体重减轻也与 AF 减少有关。到目前为止,还没有研究比较现代非侵入性(AAD 联合危险因素管理(RFM))方法与现代侵入性(CA)治疗。该试验的目的是比较现代侵入性(CA)和非侵入性(AAD 联合危险因素管理)治疗 AF 的疗效。

方法和分析

该试验将是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机非劣效性试验。将招募有症状的 AF 和 BMI>30 的患者,并按 1:1 的比例随机分配到 CA 或 RFM 组(RFM+AAD)。在 CA 组中,将进行肺静脉隔离(在非阵发性患者中结合额外的病变集)。对于 RFM+AAD 组的患者,目标是在 6-12 个月内减轻 10%的体重,增加身体活动能力并减少饮酒量。主要终点是持续>30 秒的 AF 或规律房性心动过速发作。次要终点包括 AF 负荷、与 AF 再发相关的临床终点、使用专用问卷评估的生活质量变化、心肺功能适应能力的变化和代谢终点。预计 RFM+AAD 的 AF 无发作率为 65%,CA 的为 60%;因此,预计将招募 202 名患者,以 80%的效能、5%单侧α和 12%的非劣效性边际实现非劣效性。

伦理和传播

PRAGUE-25 试验将确定现代非侵入性 AF 治疗策略是否不劣于 CA。该研究已获得大学医院 Kralovske Vinohrady 伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将在科学会议和同行评议的科学期刊上公布。随访结束后,可应主要研究者的要求提供数据。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov 注册表(NCT04011800)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f795/9204431/2e5bab2008e1/bmjopen-2021-056522f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验