• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患者相比,医学实习生对全食物、植物性饮食的认知:一项横断面试点研究。

Whole-Foods, Plant-Based Diet Perceptions of Medical Trainees Compared to Their Patients: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

作者信息

Morton Kara F, Pantalos Diana C, Ziegler Craig, Patel Pradip D

机构信息

Department of Undergraduate Medical Education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA, (KFM, CZ); Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA, (DCP. PDP).

出版信息

Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Sep 1;16(3):318-333. doi: 10.1177/15598276211041551. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/15598276211041551
PMID:35706594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189575/
Abstract

: To evaluate medical trainees' and patients' perceptions of the utility of a whole-foods, plant-based (WFPB) diet for chronic disease management. : A cross-sectional study using two original survey tools was implemented. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from trainees and patients to evaluate perceived motivations and barriers to WFPB diet implementation. : Two hundred trainees and 52 patients responded to the surveys. Nearly half (48%) of patients were willing to try a WFPB diet, expressing a desire for additional information and help with its practical application. Over half (53%) of trainees were willing to recommend a WFPB diet to patients but expressed concern about its acceptability and feasibility. Patients perceived significantly more barriers related to personal enjoyment of animal products while trainees perceived more socioeconomic barriers. : Poor diet has been identified as the United States' leading risk factor for mortality from chronic diseases. Plant-predominant diets, such as a WFPB diet, are associated with improved health outcomes and may be an acceptable solution for many patients. WFPB dietary modification could be pursued with a motivational interviewing approach that targets patients' individual goals. Medical providers should address their own assumptions regarding the dietary changes their patients are willing to make.

摘要

评估医学实习生和患者对全食物、植物性(WFPB)饮食在慢性病管理中的效用的看法。

采用两项原始调查工具进行了一项横断面研究。从实习生和患者那里收集了定量和定性数据,以评估实施WFPB饮食的感知动机和障碍。

200名实习生和52名患者对调查做出了回应。近一半(48%)的患者愿意尝试WFPB饮食,表示希望获得更多信息并在实际应用中得到帮助。超过一半(53%)的实习生愿意向患者推荐WFPB饮食,但对其可接受性和可行性表示担忧。患者认为与个人对动物产品的喜好相关的障碍明显更多,而实习生则认为更多的是社会经济障碍。

不良饮食已被确定为美国慢性病死亡的主要风险因素。以植物为主的饮食,如WFPB饮食,与改善健康结果相关,可能是许多患者可以接受的解决方案。可以采用针对患者个人目标的动机性访谈方法来推行WFPB饮食调整。医疗服务提供者应该正视他们自己对患者愿意做出的饮食改变的假设。

相似文献

1
Whole-Foods, Plant-Based Diet Perceptions of Medical Trainees Compared to Their Patients: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.与患者相比,医学实习生对全食物、植物性饮食的认知:一项横断面试点研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Sep 1;16(3):318-333. doi: 10.1177/15598276211041551. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
2
A Place for Plant-Based Nutrition in US Medical School Curriculum: A Survey-Based Study.美国医学院课程中植物性营养的地位:一项基于调查的研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jan 16;16(3):271-283. doi: 10.1177/1559827620988677. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
3
A whole-food plant-based experiential education program for health care providers results in personal and professional changes.全食物植物性体验式教育培训项目可使医疗保健提供者实现个人和职业上的转变。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Dec;32(12):788-794. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000305.
4
Theoretical Food and Nutrient Composition of Whole-Food Plant-Based and Vegan Diets Compared to Current Dietary Recommendations.全食物植物性饮食和纯素饮食与当前饮食建议的理论食物及营养素构成比较。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):625. doi: 10.3390/nu11030625.
5
Nutrient and Food Intake of Participants in a Whole-Food Plant-Based Lifestyle Program.参与者的全食物植物性生活方式计划的营养和食物摄入量。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2021 May-Jun;40(4):333-348. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2020.1778584. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Piloting a brief assessment to capture consumption of whole plant food and water: version 1.0 of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine Diet Screener (ACLM Diet Screener).试行一项简短评估以获取全植物性食物和水的摄入量:美国生活方式医学学院饮食筛查工具(ACLM饮食筛查工具)1.0版。
Front Nutr. 2024 Apr 26;11:1356676. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1356676. eCollection 2024.
7
Participant characteristics and self-reported weight status in a cross-sectional pilot survey of self-identified followers of popular diets: Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey.参与人群特征及自我报告体重状况在横断面流行饮食追随者自我识别的初步调查中:坚持个人口味饮食方法(ADAPT)可行性调查。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(15):2717-2727. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020001330. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
A Whole Food, Plant-Based Randomized Controlled Trial in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Feasibility, Nutrient, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.一项针对转移性乳腺癌的全食物、植物性随机对照试验:可行性、营养及患者报告结局
Res Sq. 2023 Nov 21:rs.3.rs-3606685. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3606685/v1.
9
A whole-food, plant-based program in an African American faith-based population.一项针对非裔美国信教人群的全食物、植物性饮食计划。
Front Nutr. 2023 Jul 14;10:1196512. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1196512. eCollection 2023.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding Health Professionals' Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Plant-Based Nutrition: A Narrative Review.解读医疗保健专业人员对植物性营养的态度和看法:一项叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 24;17(13):2095. doi: 10.3390/nu17132095.
2
Californian Public University Students' Attitudes, Beliefs, and Barriers to Plant-Based Nutrition.加利福尼亚州立大学学生对植物性营养的态度、信念及障碍
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Dec 1:15598276241303700. doi: 10.1177/15598276241303700.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Pilot Plant-Based Lifestyle Medicine Program in a Safety-Net Setting.基于植物的生活方式医学计划在保障体系中的试点研究:患者报告结局
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 24;15(13):2857. doi: 10.3390/nu15132857.

本文引用的文献

1
A Place for Plant-Based Nutrition in US Medical School Curriculum: A Survey-Based Study.美国医学院课程中植物性营养的地位:一项基于调查的研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jan 16;16(3):271-283. doi: 10.1177/1559827620988677. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
2
Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.饮食中总蛋白、动物蛋白和植物蛋白的摄入量与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率的关系:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 22;370:m2412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2412.
3
Change in vegetable and fruit consumption in Canada between 2004 and 2015.2004年至2015年间加拿大蔬菜水果消费量的变化。
Health Rep. 2020 Jun 24;31(4):3-12. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000400001-eng.
4
Catalysts for Change: Accelerating the Lifestyle Medicine Movement Through Professionals in Training.变革的推动者:通过专业培训人员加速生活方式医学运动
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 May 8;13(5):487-494. doi: 10.1177/1559827619844505. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
5
Cardiometabolic risk factors in vegans; A meta-analysis of observational studies.素食者的心血代谢危险因素;观察性研究的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209086. eCollection 2018.
6
Family Physicians' Perspectives on Their Weight Loss Nutrition Counseling in a High Obesity Prevalence Area.家庭医生在高肥胖患病率地区对其减肥营养咨询的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):522-528. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170467.
7
The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States.《1990 - 2016年美国健康状况:美国各州的疾病、伤害及风险因素负担》
JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1444-1472. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0158.
8
Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer.食物种类与结直肠癌风险。
Int J Cancer. 2018 May 1;142(9):1748-1758. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31198. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Perceptions of Nutrition Education in the Current Medical School Curriculum.当前医学院课程中对营养教育的认知
Fam Med. 2017 Nov;49(10):803-806.
10
Disparities in State-Specific Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption - United States, 2015.2015年美国各州成人水果和蔬菜消费量的差异
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 17;66(45):1241-1247. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6645a1.