Waissengrin Barliz, Levin Roni, Wolf Ido, Shachar Eliya, Sonnenblick Amir
Breast Cancer Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University (TAU), Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Apr;17(2):146-152. doi: 10.1159/000516936. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
Most patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive first-line treatment with anti-HER2 agents and have already received anti-HER2 therapy as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in the local setting of their disease presentation. Despite that, they constitute only a minority among clinical trials, and their response to reintroduction to anti-HER2 treatments is inconclusive based upon conflicting studies. We aimed to examine if previous exposure influences the clinical outcome of patients treated with anti-HER2 treatments compared to patients who were naïve to anti-HER2 agents.
We conducted a retrospective observational study of HER2-positive MBC patients who were treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab from 2014 to 2018. We collected and analyzed data including patients' demographic characteristic as well as extracted data of previous treatment regimens and the efficiency of the anti-HER2 therapy measured by response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).
Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria, 26 (32.5%) of them were previously exposed to anti-HER2 treatments and 54 (67.5%) were not previously exposed to anti-HER2 therapy. No significant differences were detected in RR after 3 months of treatment ( = 0.684). TTP was significantly better among patients with no previous exposure in comparison with patients with previous exposure to anti-HER2 therapy (21 vs. 14 months, = 0.044) and we noted a trend in better OS ( = 0.056).
Our analysis suggests that previous exposure to anti-HER2 agents might influence the clinical outcome of first-line treatment in metastatic HER2 patients. These findings justify further exploration of the benefit of reintroduction of anti-HER2 treatment enabling the optimal treatment for patients with previous anti-HER2 therapy exposure.
大多数HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者接受抗HER2药物一线治疗,并且在疾病呈现的局部阶段已接受抗HER2治疗作为辅助或新辅助治疗。尽管如此,他们在临床试验中仅占少数,而且基于相互矛盾的研究,他们对重新使用抗HER2治疗的反应尚无定论。我们旨在研究与未接触过抗HER2药物的患者相比,既往接触抗HER2治疗是否会影响接受抗HER2治疗患者的临床结局。
我们对2014年至2018年接受曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗治疗的HER2阳性MBC患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。我们收集并分析了数据,包括患者的人口统计学特征,以及既往治疗方案的提取数据和通过缓解率(RR)、肿瘤进展时间(TTP)和总生存期(OS)衡量的抗HER2治疗的疗效。
80例患者符合纳入标准,其中26例(32.5%)既往接触过抗HER2治疗,54例(67.5%)既往未接触过抗HER2治疗。治疗3个月后的RR无显著差异(P = 0.684)。与既往接触过抗HER2治疗的患者相比,既往未接触过抗HER2治疗的患者TTP显著更好(21个月对14个月,P = 0.044),并且我们注意到OS有更好的趋势(P = 0.056)。
我们的分析表明,既往接触抗HER2药物可能会影响转移性HER2患者一线治疗的临床结局。这些发现证明有必要进一步探索重新引入抗HER2治疗的益处,从而为既往接受过抗HER2治疗的患者实现最佳治疗。