Rathmann Joachim, Korpela Kalevi M, Stojakowits Philipp
Institute of Geography, Augsburg University, Augsburg, Germany.
Faculty of Social Sciences/Psychology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:901799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901799. eCollection 2022.
We provide an extension of the Savanna perceptual preference hypothesis ("Savanna Hypothesis"), supposing that interaction with landscapes offering survival advantage for human groups during evolution might have gradually evolved to permanent landscape preferences. This additional support is based on the palaeoenvironmental analysis of the spread of modern humans into Europe in the late Pleistocene and their living environments there. Our hypothesis is that the preference for park-like landscapes after African savannas experienced a kind of "refreshment" in the Pleistocene. Thus, preferences for certain types of natural settings and scenes may have a more continuous evolutionary history than previously thought. The extended Savanna Hypothesis termed "Pleistocene Hypothesis" might stimulate further work on this important topic linking human evolution and human environmental preferences.
我们对热带稀树草原感知偏好假说(“热带稀树草原假说”)进行了拓展,假定在进化过程中,与能为人类群体提供生存优势的景观的相互作用可能已逐渐演变为对景观的永久性偏好。这一补充论据基于对晚更新世现代人类向欧洲扩散及其在当地生活环境的古环境分析。我们的假说是,对类似非洲热带稀树草原的公园式景观的偏好,在更新世经历了某种“更新”。因此,对某些类型自然环境和场景的偏好可能具有比此前认为的更连续的进化史。这个被称为“更新世假说”的拓展版热带稀树草原假说,可能会激发关于这个将人类进化与人类环境偏好联系起来的重要课题的进一步研究。